Matchup reading archive

Frozen reading snapshot

This preserves the generated article’s default view and linked evidence. Interactive controls and private browser notes are excluded; typography uses installed fallback fonts. Its predictions and schedule are historical statements, not a current game status.

Capture dates and other versions · Latest recorded game history · Current brief URL

Football / Matchup notebook / Week 9

Troy
at James Madison

The score estimate, the unit production and the questions to take into the film room.

Oct 29, 2026 · Oct 29, 7:30 PM ETBridgeforth Stadium · Source-designated home fieldTemplate-generated from published evidence · Sep 12, 2026 forecast edition
Troy18.9Projected points
Model home margin+12.8James Madison by 12.8

75.9% home win estimate · 50.6 total

James Madison31.7Projected points

Read the range. The nominal 80% home-margin range is -11.0 to +36.5 points. It includes a win by either team. The range and probability curve were calibrated on 2024 outcomes.

Know the inputs. The production model uses team identities, prior scores and home field. The unit and player statistics below supply context; they do not alter this prediction. Transfers, injuries, weather and coaching changes are not explicit model features.

The unit matchup / Descriptive evidence

Put the production side by side.

Open the efficiency desk →

Play-weighted source rates against each team’s own opponents. These are unadjusted historical observations, not a head-to-head forecast or a new input to the score model. Defensive figures describe opponent production; lower EPA allowed is better.

2025 team statistics · FBS opponents only · Source retrieved Sep 9, 2026.

When Troy has the ball

Troy vs James Madison

2025 FBS opponent unit production
MeasureTroyOffense producedJames MadisonDefense allowed
EPA / play-0.08513 games · 843 recorded plays-0.13813 games · 783 recorded plays
Pass EPA / play-0.06313 games · 462 recorded plays-0.15313 games · 429 recorded plays
Rush EPA / play-0.08213 games · 378 recorded plays-0.11613 games · 352 recorded plays
Yards / play4.6713 games · 843 recorded plays4.6713 games · 783 recorded plays
Explosive play share7.1%13 games · 843 recorded plays7.2%13 games · 783 recorded plays
Stuffed rush share20.1%13 games · 378 recorded plays16.5%13 games · 352 recorded plays

Troy: 13 team records from 13 scheduled finals; 0 finals missing team data.

James Madison: 13 games with opponent records from 13 scheduled finals.

Each measure uses its own available plays. A missing rate is not zero. Stuffed-run share uses source-classified stuffed carries; higher is better for the defense.

When James Madison has the ball

James Madison vs Troy

2025 FBS opponent unit production
MeasureJames MadisonOffense producedTroyDefense allowed
EPA / play0.16413 games · 895 recorded plays-0.00213 games · 860 recorded plays
Pass EPA / play0.13013 games · 377 recorded plays-0.03913 games · 387 recorded plays
Rush EPA / play0.21613 games · 514 recorded plays0.05013 games · 470 recorded plays
Yards / play6.5113 games · 895 recorded plays5.8013 games · 860 recorded plays
Explosive play share8.3%13 games · 895 recorded plays8.1%13 games · 860 recorded plays
Stuffed rush share12.1%13 games · 514 recorded plays12.8%13 games · 470 recorded plays

James Madison: 13 team records from 13 scheduled finals; 0 finals missing team data.

Troy: 13 games with opponent records from 13 scheduled finals.

Each measure uses its own available plays. A missing rate is not zero. Stuffed-run share uses source-classified stuffed carries; higher is better for the defense.

Metric definitions and film questions

EPA / play

Offensive expected points added divided by recorded scrimmage plays. Source EPA totals are rounded; this is unadjusted production.

On film: Which downs and field positions account for the efficiency? Review the game log before assigning a coverage.

Pass EPA / play

Passing EPA divided by source pass plays; these are not necessarily official pass attempts.

On film: Separate protection, pressure and coverage on film. Team passing EPA does not identify which player or scheme created the result.

Rush EPA / play

Rushing EPA divided by source rushing plays.

On film: Check box counts, blocking and quarterback run involvement. These totals do not establish a front or gap tendency.

Yards / play

Source offensive yards divided by scrimmage plays. Do not substitute passing plus rushing yards for the published offensive total.

On film: Separate sustained gains from a few long plays, and inspect opponent quality before comparing averages.

Explosive play share

Source-classified explosive plays divided by scrimmage plays. EPA_explosive is a count, not EPA. This is our stated denominator, not a claim to reproduce every source rate or a fixed yardage threshold.

On film: Review the source-classified explosive plays on film. This measure does not establish a fixed yardage threshold.

Stuffed rush share

Source stuffed carries divided by rushing plays. Lower is favorable for an offense; higher is favorable for the defending team.

On film: Check where runs break down and which fronts were involved. A team rate is not an individual blocking grade.

Historical personnel / 2025

Who supplied the production?

Explore player rankings →

Up to two qualified players per program and category, ordered by total source EPA. Minimums: 100 passing, 50 rushing or 30 receiving plays. These 2025 affiliations do not verify current rosters, eligibility, availability or starting roles. Player totals include all their recorded opponents and do not follow the team-sample filter above. Never add EPA across overlapping categories.

Troy

Player / categoryPlaysTotal EPAEPA / play
Tucker Kilcreasepassing · FBS rank 1052156.070.024
Goose Crowderpassing · FBS rank 140166-26.66-0.139
Tucker Kilcreaserushing · FBS rank 227852.600.031
Tae Meadowsrushing · FBS rank 357133-10.92-0.082
Tray Taylorreceiving · FBS rank 1474631.550.686
RaRa Thomasreceiving · FBS rank 1706829.420.433

James Madison

Player / categoryPlaysTotal EPAEPA / play
Alonza Barnett IIIpassing · FBS rank 5733838.870.107
Wayne Knightrushing · FBS rank 3619835.960.182
Alonza Barnett IIIrushing · FBS rank 4110133.650.333
Landon Ellisreceiving · FBS rank 725343.080.813
Nick DeGennaroreceiving · FBS rank 2464821.800.454
Source receipts and linked data editions

SportsDataverse bulk releases, publisher-stated CC BY 4.0. Silvermine aggregates the team rates and selects historical player leaders. Neither collection time nor this brief’s publication is backdated to the games described.

Team edition: 9b220906aa39e5ffafc171a15995b28beba495cfcf257902d7dc9f2e747dcdcb

Player catalog edition: e1999e227eb03908787ef9af2761a62d35f5fee930102a9140b46d2afba3cce0

Download 2025 player statistics ↗ · SHA-256: cc68ee5060ff517c90e79389bd5d901c6f1b0bc1648b8b5735bd8f62f051500d

  • 2025 / schedule · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:12.578400Z
    bc8fb0df43bf5e3b2f8a1973a78ca909901b4370e3a690cab6e2c62cf8290aca
  • 2025 / team_advanced · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:22.052664Z
    63d100ace111c00e0171a958974d2f6f589c0cfcef4834a113232b0a734be77f
  • 2025 / teams · Retrieved 2026-09-05T05:20:51.123196Z
    5446f91a8a0d27e112fa7369ba0e887ed27aa6eec61130e00f20339ef50e7abf
  • 2026 / schedule · Retrieved 2026-09-12T13:29:39.244014Z
    5b6f62a42001c37b2471e094b5c251c7ee6d99f6e93c8ff452fc4d90e4e9bcf2
  • 2026 / team_advanced · Retrieved 2026-09-12T13:29:47.262896Z
    debe1ef4fbb03863d319980bc87ec69c9ae0e198b72848c1ec8c2a1b32a953b2
  • 2026 / teams · Retrieved 2026-09-05T05:21:00.957219Z
    6d3ec4bd262943dfa3777e4c31ece0a20eac2bb6194ef20a84c165b7cd2240fd
  • 2025 / box · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:14.853561Z
    0f41a1ce9cb76fdaefc87d694d15b3255db02c569ac0e8ff2de7c9c998208cc2
  • 2025 / passing · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:17.096058Z
    b8dab38e8485c565b871fb5e7fe5338a70dc39bdcafb95b5941089cd71aa9b38
  • 2025 / receiving · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:19.043912Z
    302c53ac4c2316f1d9611e80e06f98186f176e4feb8a4531ef4290841ee6aac5
  • 2025 / rushing · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:18.042034Z
    c4ed1fb90a293b29477046419f59f8a1a6d41adc21a79cc11b255b48b0e3ed30
  • 2025 / schedule · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:12.578400Z
    bc8fb0df43bf5e3b2f8a1973a78ca909901b4370e3a690cab6e2c62cf8290aca
  • 2025 / teams · Retrieved 2026-09-05T05:20:51.123196Z
    5446f91a8a0d27e112fa7369ba0e887ed27aa6eec61130e00f20339ef50e7abf
The market checkpoint

Check the record before the edge.

Open this game’s forecast history →

The game record keeps registered forecast versions, source-state observations and qualifying line comparisons. The prospective scorecard selects the earliest eligible registration; that can be an older model version than this brief.

Explore the prospective scorecard →

The separate imported archive has no line for this game. See the dated game record for any qualifying feed observations; an absent quote is not replaced with a guessed price.

A model home margin of +5 and a home spread of −3 differ by +2 points toward the home side. This describes disagreement, not a betting return.

Retained reading snapshots of this brief →

How much weight to give this forecast

The ridge-team-calibrated-v2 model was evaluated on 784 games from 2025, fitted using earlier seasons. Mean absolute margin error was 14.2 points. These are retrospective test results, separate from the prospective record.

Model: ridge-team-calibrated-v2-b4a3a7280415 · Forecast cutoff: 2026-09-12T13:29:53.576737Z. Schedule and source statistics: SportsDataverse, CC BY 4.0. Silvermine supplies the independent model, aggregations and generated commentary.

Model methodology · Weekly model experiment · All football matchups

Frozen supporting data files

These downloads retain this snapshot’s bytes. Other program, player and methodology links open the current site.