Matchup reading archive

Frozen reading snapshot

This preserves the generated article’s default view and linked evidence. Interactive controls and private browser notes are excluded; typography uses installed fallback fonts. Its predictions and schedule are historical statements, not a current game status.

Capture dates and other versions · Latest recorded game history · Current brief URL

Football / Matchup notebook / Week 9

California
at NC State

The score estimate, the unit production and the questions to take into the film room.

Oct 31, 2026 · Kickoff time unconfirmedCarter-Finley Stadium · Source-designated home fieldTemplate-generated from published evidence · Sep 12, 2026 forecast edition
California23.9Projected points
Model home margin+6.2NC State by 6.2

64.1% home win estimate · 53.9 total

NC State30.1Projected points

Read the range. The nominal 80% home-margin range is -17.5 to +30.0 points. It includes a win by either team. The range and probability curve were calibrated on 2024 outcomes.

Know the inputs. The production model uses team identities, prior scores and home field. The unit and player statistics below supply context; they do not alter this prediction. Transfers, injuries, weather and coaching changes are not explicit model features.

The unit matchup / Descriptive evidence

Put the production side by side.

Open the efficiency desk →

Play-weighted source rates against each team’s own opponents. These are unadjusted historical observations, not a head-to-head forecast or a new input to the score model. Defensive figures describe opponent production; lower EPA allowed is better.

2025 team statistics · FBS opponents only · Source retrieved Sep 9, 2026.

When California has the ball

California vs NC State

2025 FBS opponent unit production
MeasureCaliforniaOffense producedNC StateDefense allowed
EPA / play0.03212 games · 828 recorded plays0.13012 games · 821 recorded plays
Pass EPA / play0.12012 games · 504 recorded plays0.17512 games · 459 recorded plays
Rush EPA / play-0.02812 games · 319 recorded plays0.08912 games · 360 recorded plays
Yards / play5.2912 games · 828 recorded plays6.3812 games · 821 recorded plays
Explosive play share6.8%12 games · 828 recorded plays7.2%12 games · 821 recorded plays
Stuffed rush share14.4%12 games · 319 recorded plays13.1%12 games · 360 recorded plays

California: 12 team records from 12 scheduled finals; 0 finals missing team data.

NC State: 12 games with opponent records from 12 scheduled finals.

Each measure uses its own available plays. A missing rate is not zero. Stuffed-run share uses source-classified stuffed carries; higher is better for the defense.

When NC State has the ball

NC State vs California

2025 FBS opponent unit production
MeasureNC StateOffense producedCaliforniaDefense allowed
EPA / play0.09712 games · 763 recorded plays0.14912 games · 793 recorded plays
Pass EPA / play0.14612 games · 399 recorded plays0.07112 games · 406 recorded plays
Rush EPA / play0.07712 games · 360 recorded plays0.22012 games · 384 recorded plays
Yards / play5.8312 games · 763 recorded plays5.7212 games · 793 recorded plays
Explosive play share8.8%12 games · 763 recorded plays7.8%12 games · 793 recorded plays
Stuffed rush share16.9%12 games · 360 recorded plays9.4%12 games · 384 recorded plays

NC State: 12 team records from 12 scheduled finals; 0 finals missing team data.

California: 12 games with opponent records from 12 scheduled finals.

Each measure uses its own available plays. A missing rate is not zero. Stuffed-run share uses source-classified stuffed carries; higher is better for the defense.

Metric definitions and film questions

EPA / play

Offensive expected points added divided by recorded scrimmage plays. Source EPA totals are rounded; this is unadjusted production.

On film: Which downs and field positions account for the efficiency? Review the game log before assigning a coverage.

Pass EPA / play

Passing EPA divided by source pass plays; these are not necessarily official pass attempts.

On film: Separate protection, pressure and coverage on film. Team passing EPA does not identify which player or scheme created the result.

Rush EPA / play

Rushing EPA divided by source rushing plays.

On film: Check box counts, blocking and quarterback run involvement. These totals do not establish a front or gap tendency.

Yards / play

Source offensive yards divided by scrimmage plays. Do not substitute passing plus rushing yards for the published offensive total.

On film: Separate sustained gains from a few long plays, and inspect opponent quality before comparing averages.

Explosive play share

Source-classified explosive plays divided by scrimmage plays. EPA_explosive is a count, not EPA. This is our stated denominator, not a claim to reproduce every source rate or a fixed yardage threshold.

On film: Review the source-classified explosive plays on film. This measure does not establish a fixed yardage threshold.

Stuffed rush share

Source stuffed carries divided by rushing plays. Lower is favorable for an offense; higher is favorable for the defending team.

On film: Check where runs break down and which fronts were involved. A team rate is not an individual blocking grade.

Historical personnel / 2025

Who supplied the production?

Explore player rankings →

Up to two qualified players per program and category, ordered by total source EPA. Minimums: 100 passing, 50 rushing or 30 receiving plays. These 2025 affiliations do not verify current rosters, eligibility, availability or starting roles. Player totals include all their recorded opponents and do not follow the team-sample filter above. Never add EPA across overlapping categories.

California

Player / categoryPlaysTotal EPAEPA / play
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutelepassing · FBS rank 4045659.190.120
Kendrick Raphaelrushing · FBS rank 2352151.330.006
Trond Grizzellreceiving · FBS rank 1128635.850.417
Jacob De Jesusreceiving · FBS rank 11914535.180.243

NC State

Player / categoryPlaysTotal EPAEPA / play
CJ Baileypassing · FBS rank 4636055.340.142
CJ Baileyrushing · FBS rank 785923.200.393
Jayden Scottrushing · FBS rank 27196-1.48-0.015
Terrell Andersonreceiving · FBS rank 735143.040.844
Justin Jolyreceiving · FBS rank 1866127.440.450
Source receipts and linked data editions

SportsDataverse bulk releases, publisher-stated CC BY 4.0. Silvermine aggregates the team rates and selects historical player leaders. Neither collection time nor this brief’s publication is backdated to the games described.

Team edition: 9b220906aa39e5ffafc171a15995b28beba495cfcf257902d7dc9f2e747dcdcb

Player catalog edition: e1999e227eb03908787ef9af2761a62d35f5fee930102a9140b46d2afba3cce0

Download 2025 player statistics ↗ · SHA-256: cc68ee5060ff517c90e79389bd5d901c6f1b0bc1648b8b5735bd8f62f051500d

  • 2025 / schedule · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:12.578400Z
    bc8fb0df43bf5e3b2f8a1973a78ca909901b4370e3a690cab6e2c62cf8290aca
  • 2025 / team_advanced · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:22.052664Z
    63d100ace111c00e0171a958974d2f6f589c0cfcef4834a113232b0a734be77f
  • 2025 / teams · Retrieved 2026-09-05T05:20:51.123196Z
    5446f91a8a0d27e112fa7369ba0e887ed27aa6eec61130e00f20339ef50e7abf
  • 2026 / schedule · Retrieved 2026-09-12T13:29:39.244014Z
    5b6f62a42001c37b2471e094b5c251c7ee6d99f6e93c8ff452fc4d90e4e9bcf2
  • 2026 / team_advanced · Retrieved 2026-09-12T13:29:47.262896Z
    debe1ef4fbb03863d319980bc87ec69c9ae0e198b72848c1ec8c2a1b32a953b2
  • 2026 / teams · Retrieved 2026-09-05T05:21:00.957219Z
    6d3ec4bd262943dfa3777e4c31ece0a20eac2bb6194ef20a84c165b7cd2240fd
  • 2025 / box · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:14.853561Z
    0f41a1ce9cb76fdaefc87d694d15b3255db02c569ac0e8ff2de7c9c998208cc2
  • 2025 / passing · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:17.096058Z
    b8dab38e8485c565b871fb5e7fe5338a70dc39bdcafb95b5941089cd71aa9b38
  • 2025 / receiving · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:19.043912Z
    302c53ac4c2316f1d9611e80e06f98186f176e4feb8a4531ef4290841ee6aac5
  • 2025 / rushing · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:18.042034Z
    c4ed1fb90a293b29477046419f59f8a1a6d41adc21a79cc11b255b48b0e3ed30
  • 2025 / schedule · Retrieved 2026-09-09T00:21:12.578400Z
    bc8fb0df43bf5e3b2f8a1973a78ca909901b4370e3a690cab6e2c62cf8290aca
  • 2025 / teams · Retrieved 2026-09-05T05:20:51.123196Z
    5446f91a8a0d27e112fa7369ba0e887ed27aa6eec61130e00f20339ef50e7abf
The market checkpoint

Check the record before the edge.

Open this game’s forecast history →

The game record keeps registered forecast versions, source-state observations and qualifying line comparisons. The prospective scorecard selects the earliest eligible registration; that can be an older model version than this brief.

Explore the prospective scorecard →

The separate imported archive has no line for this game. See the dated game record for any qualifying feed observations; an absent quote is not replaced with a guessed price.

A model home margin of +5 and a home spread of −3 differ by +2 points toward the home side. This describes disagreement, not a betting return.

Retained reading snapshots of this brief →

How much weight to give this forecast

The ridge-team-calibrated-v2 model was evaluated on 784 games from 2025, fitted using earlier seasons. Mean absolute margin error was 14.2 points. These are retrospective test results, separate from the prospective record.

Model: ridge-team-calibrated-v2-b4a3a7280415 · Forecast cutoff: 2026-09-12T13:29:53.576737Z. Schedule and source statistics: SportsDataverse, CC BY 4.0. Silvermine supplies the independent model, aggregations and generated commentary.

Model methodology · Weekly model experiment · All football matchups

Frozen supporting data files

These downloads retain this snapshot’s bytes. Other program, player and methodology links open the current site.