SSILVERMINECollege basketball stats
LIVE BOARD
2026–27 SEASON
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball

Western KY

2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.

Independent preseason modelNo.157

+0.7 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions

18142025–26 recorded finals
105.9Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
105.2Adjusted defense · lower is better
71.4Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID

A second read on Western KY.

Open model archive ↗

Checking the attributed publisher rating…

01 / Both ends of the floor

The possession profile.

181432 recorded games · 32 paired efficiency samples · pace 71.1Mean opponent adj. net 0.0 · 30 rated opponents
Offense

Effective FG%

48.1%32 games · higher is betterRank 332 / 366 · 9th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent effective FG%

50.5%32 games · lower is betterRank 160 / 366 · 56th favorable percentile
Offense

Turnover rate

14.5%32 games · lower is betterRank 44 / 366 · 88th favorable percentile
Defense

Turnovers forced

17.4%32 games · higher is betterRank 142 / 366 · 61th favorable percentile
Offense

Offensive rebound rate

32.5%32 games · higher is betterRank 132 / 366 · 64th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent offensive rebound rate

29.2%32 games · lower is betterRank 142 / 366 · 61th favorable percentile
Offense

Free-throw attempt rate

41.8%32 games · higher is betterRank 31 / 366 · 92th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

45.5%32 games · lower is betterRank 356 / 366 · 3th favorable percentile
Shooting and ball-movement detail
MetricObserved rateGamesDefinition
Offensive efficiency110.632Points per 100 estimated possessions.
Defensive efficiency106.232Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions.
Two-point FG%46.0%32(FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Opponent two-point FG%50.3%32Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Three-point FG%34.1%323PM / 3PA.
Opponent three-point FG%33.8%32Opponent 3PM / 3PA.
Three-point attempt share39.9%323PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade.
Opponent three-point attempt share42.4%32Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure.
Free-throw accuracy75.9%32FTM / FTA.
Opponent free-throw accuracy69.4%32Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill.
Assisted field-goal share52.0%32Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement.
Opponent assisted FG share57.7%32Opponent assists / FGM.

Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.

NCAA source context / 202526

What did the possessions look like?

Compare possession style →
1.093
Points / source possession
72.66
Source possessions / game
24.7%
Transition share
18.3%
Assisted share
2.1%
Garbage-time share

2,325 source possession rows across 32 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.

02 / The film queue

Turn a number into a question.

Full-season relative strengths and watch points
A relative strength

Free-throw attempt rate

41.8% · rank 31 of 366 · 32 games

Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?

A relative strength

Turnover rate

14.5% · rank 44 of 366 · 32 games

Where do turnovers occur under pressure, and who can relieve that pressure?

A closer look

Effective FG%

48.1% · rank 332 of 366 · 32 games

Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?

A closer look

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

45.5% · rank 356 of 366 · 32 games

Which defenders can protect the paint without surrendering free throws?

These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 10 times in the selected window; Western KY won 6. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.

03 / How the season moved

Read beyond the average.

● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Unadjusted efficiency by game. Focus a point to inspect it.70115160OldestNewest

Mar 13, 2026 · neutral vs Kennesaw St · L 87–96 · offense 113.0 / defense 124.6

Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.

Open the game-by-game scouting log · 32 games
Game / venueResultCurrent opponent rankOff. eff.Def. eff.PaceeFG%TO%ORB%
Kennesaw StMar 13, 2026 · neutralL 8796159113.0124.677.053.618.229.4
FIUMar 7, 2026 · roadL 679222991.5125.773.243.016.422.0
Missouri StMar 6, 2026 · roadL 7487186111.3130.966.544.89.035.1
UTEPFeb 28, 2026 · homeW 9765230134.790.272.067.612.516.7
New Mexico StFeb 27, 2026 · homeW 9370169117.888.778.960.211.411.4
LibertyFeb 21, 2026 · roadW 947396135.5105.369.461.013.034.5
DelawareFeb 19, 2026 · roadW 8887251126.7125.361.755.313.030.3
MTSUFeb 15, 2026 · homeW 8280164116.0113.270.757.419.821.4
FIUFeb 7, 2026 · homeW 8070229117.5102.868.145.410.343.8
Jax StateFeb 6, 2026 · homeL 667117392.299.271.636.314.027.3
MTSUJan 31, 2026 · roadW 656016498.190.566.344.512.123.8
Kennesaw StJan 29, 2026 · roadL 697215997.1101.371.134.111.335.6
Sam HoustonJan 24, 2026 · roadL 587312786.5108.967.145.128.329.4
LibertyJan 22, 2026 · homeL 697696106.6117.464.750.920.133.3
Kennesaw StJan 17, 2026 · homeL 658115989.8112.072.436.811.127.5
Missouri StJan 15, 2026 · homeW 8772186131.5108.966.157.312.137.9
UTEPJan 10, 2026 · roadW 6856230100.182.468.043.014.738.6
New Mexico StJan 9, 2026 · roadL 648016996.9121.166.034.67.636.0
Louisiana TechJan 4, 2026 · homeW 6661156101.693.965.043.415.427.5
Sam HoustonJan 2, 2026 · homeW 10291127131.7117.577.455.416.848.9
Jax StateDec 30, 2025 · roadL 677817397.5113.568.836.816.044.4
TulsaDec 20, 2025 · homeL 8182116114.4115.870.850.811.327.0
CampbellsvilleDec 16, 2025 · homeW 10259Unrated142.982.771.460.311.242.9
MarshallDec 11, 2025 · roadL 617717289.0112.368.635.416.034.0
EvansvilleDec 6, 2025 · homeW 8079302109.7108.372.950.819.237.8
Wichita StNov 29, 2025 · neutralW 757092117.9110.063.648.311.031.6
South FloridaNov 27, 2025 · neutralL 91977699.6106.281.252.220.823.3
VanderbiltNov 26, 2025 · neutralL 78832996.7102.980.643.521.131.8
Bethel (TN)Nov 19, 2025 · homeW 9767Unrated125.386.577.452.416.843.9
Tennessee StNov 16, 2025 · homeW 9582204123.9106.976.756.311.733.3
E KentuckyNov 11, 2025 · roadW 8779256115.4104.875.449.34.027.9
Tennessee TechNov 4, 2025 · homeW 8270315107.791.976.243.514.433.3
04 / The people behind the possessions

Personnel and workload.

Full player index →

2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →

PlayerGPMIN/GPTS/GREB/GAST/GTS%Est. usageUsage gamesAST/TO3PA
Grant NewellF3225.913.04.51.054.124.1%321.0032 games16232 games
Teagan MooreG2729.318.75.62.064.526.3%271.1527 games7027 games
Ryan MyersG3222.511.02.21.657.822.6%321.4632 games18032 games
Armelo BooneG2924.510.96.12.044.627.0%291.1629 games8629 games
LJ HackmanG3221.68.52.91.652.320.4%321.5032 games7232 games
Terrion MurdixG2423.95.63.64.143.616.4%242.4124 games1124 games
Blaise KeitaF3112.92.53.80.454.510.3%310.7931 games031 games
Cam HaffnerG2713.04.51.30.549.517.2%271.5627 games9827 games
Leeroy OdiahiF3010.12.11.00.170.19.0%300.1730 games030 games
Kade UnseldG2211.73.41.70.443.017.4%221.0022 games7522 games
Noah BoydeF2311.12.52.90.347.213.3%230.5023 games023 games
Jack EdelenG287.71.20.71.035.613.7%282.0028 games1928 games

Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.

05 / Recruiting evidence

What changed around Western KY?

Open the full recruiting file →Build a role shortlist →

This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.

15Source-listed players
14Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
87%Prior minutes represented
Role workload watch

Which source-listed role is represented?

Open roster lab →

Prior minutes are grouped by the source-reported position on the current listing. “Unrepresented” means prior minutes not attached to a same-program listing in this release; it does not establish a departure, transfer, eligibility or expected role.

RoleListedPrior minutesReturning minutesIncoming prior minutesReturning shareUnrepresented
Guard104,4184,418100%
Forward51,2031,203100%
Center0

0 listed players have no recognized source position. The workload denominator is the matched prior-production sample (5,621 minutes).

No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.

No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.

Roster observation

Who is listed in the source release?

Rank this roster’s workload →

15 source-listed players. Prior rates below are attached by exact source ID where available; missing values remain missing.

PlayerObservationPrior MPGPrior PPGPrior TS%
Teagan MooreGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers29.318.764.5%
Ryan MyersGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers22.511.057.8%
Armelo BooneGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers24.510.944.6%
LJ HackmanGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers21.68.552.3%
Terrion MurdixGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers23.95.643.6%
Blaise KeitaFSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers12.92.554.5%
Cam HaffnerGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers13.04.549.5%
Leeroy OdiahiFSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers10.12.170.1%
Kade UnseldGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers11.73.443.0%
Noah BoydeFSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers11.12.547.2%
Jack EdelenGSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers7.71.235.6%
Bryant SelebangueFSame programWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers18.47.258.1%

Showing the 12 highest prior-minute records. Open the full roster board for every source-listed player.

Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.

Look ahead / 2026–27

The next assignments.

Full published slate →

Checking the live schedule edition…

ON THE SCHEDULEDec 31, 2026 · TIME TBD

Western KY vs Kennesaw St

77.1Western KY
80.8Kennesaw St
Kennesaw St win estimate63.6%
Model signalLean
Projected home margin3.6
Projected total157.9
80% home-margin range-12.3 to 19.5
Estimated possessions74.5
Why the model tiltsfour-factor edge
Shot qualityHome 1.4 pts
Kennesaw St attack 50.9% · Western KY defense 50.2%
Western KY attack 49.4% · Kennesaw St defense 50.1%
Ball securityAway 1.2 pts
Kennesaw St attack 17.5% · Western KY defense 17.3%
Western KY attack 15.6% · Kennesaw St defense 16.6%
Second chancesHome 4.5 pts
Kennesaw St attack 32.0% · Western KY defense 28.4%
Western KY attack 28.2% · Kennesaw St defense 29.1%
Free-throw pressureHome 7.9 pts
Kennesaw St attack 40.2% · Western KY defense 40.9%
Western KY attack 35.4% · Kennesaw St defense 44.1%
Opponent-adjusted rates from the 202526 season. Positive edge favors the home side; defensive direction follows the factor (lower allowed shooting, rebounding and free-throw rates, higher forced-turnover rate).

VyStar Arena
Preseason baseline · roster changes are not model features.
No verified pregame market line imported. Check the forecast record →

Read the matchup brief →Open ESPN source game ↗
ON THE SCHEDULEJan 2, 2027 · TIME TBD

Western KY vs Jax State

71.0Western KY
73.3Jax State
Jax State win estimate60.3%
Model signalLean
Projected home margin2.3
Projected total144.3
80% home-margin range-13.6 to 18.3
Estimated possessions69.2
Why the model tiltsfour-factor edge
Shot qualityHome 1.0 pts
Jax State attack 50.1% · Western KY defense 50.2%
Western KY attack 49.4% · Jax State defense 50.5%
Ball securityAway 0.5 pts
Jax State attack 17.3% · Western KY defense 17.3%
Western KY attack 15.6% · Jax State defense 16.1%
Second chancesHome 0.8 pts
Jax State attack 30.4% · Western KY defense 28.4%
Western KY attack 28.2% · Jax State defense 27.0%
Free-throw pressureAway 4.4 pts
Jax State attack 37.2% · Western KY defense 40.9%
Western KY attack 35.4% · Jax State defense 34.8%
Opponent-adjusted rates from the 202526 season. Positive edge favors the home side; defensive direction follows the factor (lower allowed shooting, rebounding and free-throw rates, higher forced-turnover rate).

Pete Mathews Coliseum
Preseason baseline · roster changes are not model features.
No verified pregame market line imported. Check the forecast record →

Read the matchup brief →Open ESPN source game ↗
ON THE SCHEDULEJan 7, 2027 · TIME TBD

New Mexico St vs Western KY

71.5New Mexico St
75.9Western KY
Western KY win estimate65.6%
Model signalLean
Projected home margin4.4
Projected total147.4
80% home-margin range-11.5 to 20.3
Estimated possessions70.3
Why the model tiltsfour-factor edge
Shot qualityHome 1.6 pts
Western KY attack 49.4% · New Mexico St defense 49.5%
New Mexico St attack 48.5% · Western KY defense 50.2%
Ball securityAway 1.8 pts
Western KY attack 15.6% · New Mexico St defense 15.5%
New Mexico St attack 15.6% · Western KY defense 17.3%
Second chancesAway 3.3 pts
Western KY attack 28.2% · New Mexico St defense 28.9%
New Mexico St attack 31.0% · Western KY defense 28.4%
Free-throw pressureHome 0.5 pts
Western KY attack 35.4% · New Mexico St defense 41.6%
New Mexico St attack 34.3% · Western KY defense 40.9%
Opponent-adjusted rates from the 202526 season. Positive edge favors the home side; defensive direction follows the factor (lower allowed shooting, rebounding and free-throw rates, higher forced-turnover rate).

E.A. Diddle Arena
Preseason baseline · roster changes are not model features.
No verified pregame market line imported. Check the forecast record →

Read the matchup brief →Open ESPN source game ↗

Read the evidence correctly.

The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.

Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.

Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.

Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →