A relative strength
Turnover rate
12.4% · rank 2 of 366 · 32 games
Where do turnovers occur under pressure, and who can relieve that pressure?
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball
UAB
2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.
Independent preseason modelNo.106
+6.2 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions
20–122025–26 recorded finals
111.9Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
105.8Adjusted defense · lower is better
69.9Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID
A second read on UAB.
Checking the attributed publisher rating…
01 / Both ends of the floor
The possession profile.
20–1232 recorded games · 32 paired efficiency samples · pace 70.8Mean opponent adj. net 0.8 · 31 rated opponents
Offense
Effective FG%
48.6%32 games · higher is betterRank 320 / 366 · 13th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent effective FG%
49.6%32 games · lower is betterRank 106 / 366 · 71th favorable percentileOffense
Turnover rate
12.4%32 games · lower is betterRank 2 / 366 · 100th favorable percentileDefense
Turnovers forced
16.5%32 games · higher is betterRank 201 / 366 · 45th favorable percentileOffense
Offensive rebound rate
33.0%32 games · higher is betterRank 111 / 366 · 70th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent offensive rebound rate
27.2%32 games · lower is betterRank 57 / 366 · 85th favorable percentileOffense
Free-throw attempt rate
36.3%32 games · higher is betterRank 148 / 366 · 60th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
28.0%32 games · lower is betterRank 37 / 366 · 90th favorable percentileShooting and ball-movement detail
| Metric | Observed rate | Games | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offensive efficiency | 110.5 | 32 | Points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Defensive efficiency | 102.9 | 32 | Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Two-point FG% | 51.4% | 32 | (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Opponent two-point FG% | 50.4% | 32 | Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Three-point FG% | 28.1% | 32 | 3PM / 3PA. |
| Opponent three-point FG% | 32.3% | 32 | Opponent 3PM / 3PA. |
| Three-point attempt share | 30.5% | 32 | 3PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade. |
| Opponent three-point attempt share | 39.8% | 32 | Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure. |
| Free-throw accuracy | 70.5% | 32 | FTM / FTA. |
| Opponent free-throw accuracy | 72.2% | 32 | Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill. |
| Assisted field-goal share | 50.2% | 32 | Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement. |
| Opponent assisted FG share | 50.4% | 32 | Opponent assists / FGM. |
Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.
NCAA source context / 2025–26
What did the possessions look like?
2,306 source possession rows across 32 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.
02 / The film queue
Turn a number into a question.
A relative strength
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
28.0% · rank 37 of 366 · 32 games
Which defenders can protect the paint without surrendering free throws?
A closer look
Turnovers forced
16.5% · rank 201 of 366 · 32 games
Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?
A closer look
Effective FG%
48.6% · rank 320 of 366 · 32 games
Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?
These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 13 times in the selected window; UAB won 6. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.
03 / How the season moved
Read beyond the average.
● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Mar 13, 2026 · neutral vs Charlotte · L 78–83 · offense 117.2 / defense 124.7
Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.
Open the game-by-game scouting log · 32 games
| Game / venue | Result | Current opponent rank | Off. eff. | Def. eff. | Pace | eFG% | TO% | ORB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CharlotteMar 13, 2026 · neutral | L 78–83 | 181 | 117.2 | 124.7 | 66.6 | 54.0 | 9.0 | 27.8 |
| East CarolinaMar 8, 2026 · home | W 90–83 | 222 | 118.1 | 108.9 | 76.2 | 57.8 | 10.5 | 21.2 |
| CharlotteMar 5, 2026 · road | W 80–74 | 181 | 125.4 | 116.0 | 63.8 | 46.2 | 9.4 | 45.7 |
| North TexasMar 1, 2026 · home | L 58–62 | 101 | 90.4 | 96.7 | 64.1 | 44.1 | 18.7 | 23.5 |
| MemphisFeb 22, 2026 · road | W 78–67 | 85 | 108.7 | 93.4 | 71.8 | 50.8 | 16.7 | 32.4 |
| TempleFeb 19, 2026 · road | W 76–71 | 142 | 115.1 | 107.5 | 66.0 | 54.5 | 9.1 | 17.2 |
| TulaneFeb 15, 2026 · home | L 54–55 | 168 | 86.1 | 87.7 | 62.7 | 34.9 | 12.8 | 37.0 |
| TulsaFeb 12, 2026 · road | W 68–63 | 116 | 101.9 | 94.4 | 66.7 | 44.7 | 9.0 | 27.3 |
| RiceFeb 8, 2026 · home | W 71–65 | 224 | 107.0 | 97.9 | 66.4 | 46.0 | 10.5 | 34.1 |
| MemphisFeb 6, 2026 · home | L 80–90 | 85 | 100.3 | 112.8 | 79.8 | 44.7 | 16.3 | 34.8 |
| North TexasFeb 1, 2026 · road | W 72–68 | 101 | 107.9 | 101.9 | 66.7 | 55.5 | 18.0 | 26.7 |
| UTSAJan 29, 2026 · road | W 83–73 | 312 | 117.5 | 103.3 | 70.6 | 54.4 | 9.9 | 29.4 |
| South FloridaJan 23, 2026 · home | L 69–82 | 76 | 90.9 | 108.0 | 75.9 | 32.0 | 13.2 | 40.0 |
| TulsaJan 18, 2026 · home | L 77–99 | 116 | 107.5 | 138.3 | 71.6 | 47.7 | 7.0 | 22.5 |
| TulaneJan 15, 2026 · road | W 82–69 | 168 | 117.5 | 98.9 | 69.8 | 50.0 | 14.3 | 44.1 |
| East CarolinaJan 11, 2026 · road | W 87–85 | 222 | 104.3 | 101.9 | 74.2 | 47.4 | 9.6 | 26.7 |
| FAUJan 8, 2026 · home | L 71–76 | 94 | 96.1 | 102.9 | 73.9 | 42.5 | 16.2 | 24.4 |
| South FloridaJan 4, 2026 · road | W 109–106 | 76 | 112.6 | 109.5 | 77.4 | 47.6 | 8.3 | 21.4 |
| Wichita StDec 31, 2025 · home | L 70–75 | 92 | 107.7 | 115.4 | 65.0 | 46.5 | 10.8 | 28.6 |
| UNC AshevilleDec 21, 2025 · home | W 72–47 | 206 | 111.8 | 73.0 | 64.4 | 47.6 | 7.8 | 32.4 |
| Cleveland StDec 18, 2025 · home | W 101–77 | 267 | 136.6 | 104.1 | 74.0 | 62.1 | 9.5 | 36.1 |
| TroyDec 14, 2025 · home | L 85–86 | 123 | 125.2 | 126.7 | 67.9 | 62.3 | 14.7 | 31.0 |
| DrakeDec 6, 2025 · road | W 74–69 | 109 | 108.1 | 100.8 | 68.4 | 46.5 | 16.1 | 38.2 |
| MTSUDec 2, 2025 · road | L 61–76 | 164 | 92.2 | 114.8 | 66.2 | 39.7 | 16.6 | 36.6 |
| UTEPNov 25, 2025 · neutral | W 75–59 | 230 | 118.8 | 93.4 | 63.1 | 42.4 | 11.1 | 54.1 |
| S IllinoisNov 24, 2025 · neutral | W 81–73 | 124 | 115.2 | 103.8 | 70.3 | 50.0 | 12.8 | 38.1 |
| South AlabamaNov 22, 2025 · home | W 80–72 | 165 | 125.2 | 112.7 | 63.9 | 54.9 | 14.1 | 39.5 |
| RhodesNov 18, 2025 · home | W 112–56 | Unrated | 130.9 | 65.4 | 85.6 | 54.7 | 9.3 | 45.7 |
| High PointNov 15, 2025 · home | W 91–74 | 80 | 116.4 | 94.7 | 78.2 | 54.2 | 14.1 | 26.5 |
| Alabama StNov 12, 2025 · home | L 74–77 | 322 | 99.3 | 103.3 | 74.5 | 42.9 | 16.1 | 35.7 |
| NC StateNov 8, 2025 · road | L 70–94 | 45 | 93.9 | 126.1 | 74.6 | 43.7 | 18.8 | 38.6 |
| Miss Valley StNov 4, 2025 · home | W 106–55 | 365 | 125.0 | 64.9 | 84.8 | 56.1 | 9.4 | 34.1 |
04 / The people behind the possessions
Personnel and workload.
2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →
| Player | GP | MIN/G | PTS/G | REB/G | AST/G | TS% | Est. usage | Usage games | AST/TO | 3PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chance WestryG | 32 | 30.5 | 15.5 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 56.5 | 24.7% | 32 | 2.9032 games | 8732 games |
| Daniel RiveraF | 32 | 29.3 | 12.0 | 6.7 | 1.2 | 56.0 | 19.7% | 32 | 0.9332 games | 932 games |
| Evan ChatmanF | 32 | 28.9 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 1.1 | 52.7 | 14.8% | 32 | 1.8932 games | 8032 games |
| Jacob MeyerG | 28 | 28.5 | 12.4 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 49.4 | 22.9% | 28 | 0.9428 games | 10228 games |
| KyeRon Lindsay-MartinF | 28 | 22.6 | 10.8 | 6.4 | 0.6 | 57.8 | 21.6% | 28 | 0.5928 games | 228 games |
| Salim LondonG | 32 | 19.6 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 47.2 | 14.5% | 32 | 2.2732 games | 6132 games |
| Ahmad RobinsonG | 26 | 24.1 | 9.5 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 48.4 | 21.4% | 26 | 2.3226 games | 10226 games |
| Dayjaun AndersonG | 30 | 16.3 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 43.5 | 19.9% | 30 | 1.3330 games | 13330 games |
| Quaran McPhersonG | 27 | 10.8 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 56.7 | 21.3% | 27 | 0.5727 games | 4027 games |
Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.
05 / Recruiting evidence
What changed around UAB?
This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.
0Source-listed players
0Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
—Prior minutes represented
No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.
No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.
Roster observation
Who is listed in the source release?
No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.
Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.
Look ahead / 2026–27
The next assignments.
Checking the live schedule edition…
No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.
Read the evidence correctly.
The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.
Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.
Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.
Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →