A relative strength
Effective FG%
53.9% · rank 82 of 366 · 33 games
Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball
E Washington
2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.
Independent preseason modelNo.199
-2.7 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions
14–192025–26 recorded finals
108.8Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
111.5Adjusted defense · lower is better
68.9Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID
A second read on E Washington.
Checking the attributed publisher rating…
01 / Both ends of the floor
The possession profile.
14–1933 recorded games · 33 paired efficiency samples · pace 69.1Mean opponent adj. net -1.0 · 32 rated opponents
Offense
Effective FG%
53.9%33 games · higher is betterRank 82 / 366 · 78th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent effective FG%
54.8%33 games · lower is betterRank 337 / 366 · 8th favorable percentileOffense
Turnover rate
17.6%33 games · lower is betterRank 253 / 366 · 31th favorable percentileDefense
Turnovers forced
16.2%33 games · higher is betterRank 225 / 366 · 39th favorable percentileOffense
Offensive rebound rate
31.5%33 games · higher is betterRank 167 / 366 · 55th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent offensive rebound rate
30.6%33 games · lower is betterRank 213 / 366 · 42th favorable percentileOffense
Free-throw attempt rate
35.7%33 games · higher is betterRank 162 / 366 · 56th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
36.2%33 games · lower is betterRank 234 / 366 · 36th favorable percentileShooting and ball-movement detail
| Metric | Observed rate | Games | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offensive efficiency | 112.2 | 33 | Points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Defensive efficiency | 113.5 | 33 | Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Two-point FG% | 54.0% | 33 | (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Opponent two-point FG% | 55.9% | 33 | Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Three-point FG% | 35.8% | 33 | 3PM / 3PA. |
| Opponent three-point FG% | 35.3% | 33 | Opponent 3PM / 3PA. |
| Three-point attempt share | 34.8% | 33 | 3PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade. |
| Opponent three-point attempt share | 38.7% | 33 | Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure. |
| Free-throw accuracy | 74.3% | 33 | FTM / FTA. |
| Opponent free-throw accuracy | 75.9% | 33 | Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill. |
| Assisted field-goal share | 49.0% | 33 | Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement. |
| Opponent assisted FG share | 49.1% | 33 | Opponent assists / FGM. |
Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.
NCAA source context / 2025–26
What did the possessions look like?
2,296 source possession rows across 33 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.
02 / The film queue
Turn a number into a question.
A relative strength
Free-throw attempt rate
35.7% · rank 162 of 366 · 33 games
Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?
A closer look
Turnover rate
17.6% · rank 253 of 366 · 33 games
Where do turnovers occur under pressure, and who can relieve that pressure?
A closer look
Opponent effective FG%
54.8% · rank 337 of 366 · 33 games
What coverages and lineups account for the shot quality opponents receive?
These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 11 times in the selected window; E Washington won 3. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.
03 / How the season moved
Read beyond the average.
● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Mar 11, 2026 · neutral vs Idaho · L 68–81 · offense 95.1 / defense 113.2
Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.
Open the game-by-game scouting log · 33 games
| Game / venue | Result | Current opponent rank | Off. eff. | Def. eff. | Pace | eFG% | TO% | ORB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IdahoMar 11, 2026 · neutral | L 68–81 | 214 | 95.1 | 113.2 | 71.5 | 39.5 | 12.6 | 25.0 |
| Weber StMar 10, 2026 · neutral | W 84–79 | 212 | 121.1 | 113.9 | 69.4 | 60.2 | 17.3 | 32.3 |
| IdahoMar 3, 2026 · home | L 81–85 | 214 | 121.0 | 127.0 | 66.9 | 60.0 | 19.4 | 37.5 |
| N ArizonaFeb 28, 2026 · home | W 88–57 | 308 | 138.6 | 89.7 | 63.5 | 73.2 | 17.3 | 39.1 |
| N ColoradoFeb 27, 2026 · home | W 82–72 | 149 | 122.8 | 107.8 | 66.8 | 58.5 | 12.0 | 25.0 |
| Portland StFeb 21, 2026 · road | W 67–55 | 170 | 101.1 | 83.0 | 66.3 | 47.2 | 18.1 | 27.3 |
| Sacramento StFeb 20, 2026 · road | W 102–94 | 314 | 140.2 | 129.2 | 72.8 | 67.2 | 16.5 | 44.1 |
| Weber StFeb 14, 2026 · home | W 84–66 | 212 | 122.3 | 96.1 | 68.7 | 67.0 | 18.9 | 17.4 |
| Idaho StFeb 13, 2026 · home | W 88–75 | 239 | 133.7 | 114.0 | 65.8 | 61.5 | 9.1 | 21.7 |
| Montana StFeb 8, 2026 · road | W 72–71 | 163 | 111.0 | 109.5 | 64.9 | 54.3 | 17.0 | 37.0 |
| MontanaFeb 6, 2026 · road | W 82–74 | 178 | 115.9 | 104.6 | 70.7 | 59.8 | 18.4 | 29.4 |
| N ColoradoJan 31, 2026 · road | L 71–74 | 149 | 105.2 | 109.6 | 67.5 | 53.4 | 17.8 | 21.4 |
| N ArizonaJan 30, 2026 · road | L 86–92 | 308 | 132.7 | 142.0 | 64.8 | 55.2 | 18.5 | 48.6 |
| Sacramento StJan 24, 2026 · home | W 75–67 | 314 | 115.5 | 103.2 | 64.9 | 52.6 | 15.4 | 33.3 |
| Portland StJan 23, 2026 · home | L 61–65 | 170 | 90.3 | 96.2 | 67.6 | 42.3 | 19.2 | 24.2 |
| Idaho StJan 17, 2026 · road | W 84–66 | 239 | 124.3 | 97.7 | 67.6 | 56.0 | 17.8 | 24.0 |
| Weber StJan 16, 2026 · road | L 80–91 | 212 | 106.6 | 121.3 | 75.0 | 51.8 | 20.0 | 27.3 |
| MontanaJan 10, 2026 · home | W 66–65 | 178 | 104.0 | 102.5 | 63.4 | 52.7 | 14.2 | 17.2 |
| Montana StJan 9, 2026 · home | L 64–68 | 163 | 99.2 | 105.4 | 64.5 | 39.3 | 15.5 | 35.9 |
| IdahoJan 3, 2026 · road | L 81–84 | 214 | 116.8 | 121.2 | 69.3 | 45.7 | 21.6 | 56.5 |
| BYUDec 23, 2025 · road | L 81–109 | 19 | 107.9 | 145.1 | 75.1 | 53.7 | 18.6 | 28.9 |
| UtahDec 21, 2025 · road | L 77–101 | 93 | 109.1 | 143.2 | 70.6 | 45.7 | 14.2 | 40.9 |
| Washington StDec 18, 2025 · neutral | L 63–78 | 117 | 88.8 | 110.0 | 70.9 | 42.5 | 16.9 | 23.1 |
| CA BaptistDec 13, 2025 · home | L 83–88 | 131 | 117.6 | 124.7 | 70.6 | 55.1 | 15.6 | 33.3 |
| Kansas CityDec 6, 2025 · home | W 90–66 | 337 | 118.2 | 86.7 | 76.2 | 53.8 | 18.4 | 42.1 |
| DenverDec 4, 2025 · road | L 89–93 | 268 | 128.3 | 134.1 | 69.4 | 68.2 | 17.3 | 30.4 |
| North TexasNov 26, 2025 · road | L 71–79 | 101 | 97.1 | 108.0 | 65.0 | 44.4 | 20.5 | 35.9 |
| C ArkansasNov 23, 2025 · road | L 65–92 | 259 | 90.4 | 127.9 | 71.9 | 47.5 | 30.6 | 35.9 |
| Eastern OregonNov 18, 2025 · home | W 91–73 | Unrated | 123.8 | 99.3 | 73.5 | 58.2 | 15.0 | 37.1 |
| Seattle UNov 13, 2025 · road | L 67–94 | 120 | 91.0 | 127.7 | 73.6 | 48.3 | 20.4 | 22.2 |
| ColoradoNov 8, 2025 · road | L 97–102 | 69 | 123.9 | 130.3 | 69.6 | 66.9 | 14.1 | 17.9 |
| LMUNov 6, 2025 · road | L 62–70 | 160 | 88.0 | 99.4 | 70.4 | 43.3 | 18.5 | 18.2 |
| UCLANov 4, 2025 · road | L 74–80 | 27 | 104.7 | 113.2 | 70.7 | 60.2 | 22.6 | 20.7 |
04 / The people behind the possessions
Personnel and workload.
2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →
| Player | GP | MIN/G | PTS/G | REB/G | AST/G | TS% | Est. usage | Usage games | AST/TO | 3PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah MosesG | 33 | 33.4 | 17.8 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 59.7 | 26.9% | 33 | 1.4433 games | 16033 games |
| Alton Hamilton IVF | 33 | 28.1 | 13.5 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 63.8 | 22.5% | 33 | 1.0733 games | 4433 games |
| Kiree HuieF | 33 | 25.3 | 12.8 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 56.0 | 26.7% | 33 | 0.4033 games | 133 games |
| Straton RogersG | 33 | 22.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 62.3 | 11.6% | 33 | 2.2533 games | 733 games |
| Jojo AndersonG | 33 | 21.7 | 7.4 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 55.2 | 18.2% | 33 | 1.8533 games | 6833 games |
| Johnny RadfordG | 33 | 18.8 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 53.3 | 18.3% | 33 | 1.2933 games | 13033 games |
| Tyler PowellG | 33 | 16.5 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 57.4 | 14.8% | 33 | 0.9533 games | 8733 games |
| Emmett MarquardtF | 30 | 15.9 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 57.2 | 17.9% | 30 | 0.8830 games | 8130 games |
| Elijah ThomasG | 30 | 10.9 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 44.9 | 11.1% | 30 | 1.1130 games | 4230 games |
| Cole SchererG | 29 | 7.8 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 43.5 | 18.1% | 29 | 1.3029 games | 3729 games |
Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.
05 / Recruiting evidence
What changed around E Washington?
This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.
0Source-listed players
0Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
—Prior minutes represented
No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.
No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.
Roster observation
Who is listed in the source release?
No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.
Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.
Look ahead / 2026–27
The next assignments.
Checking the live schedule edition…
No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.
Read the evidence correctly.
The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.
Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.
Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.
Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →