Free-throw attempt rate
42.5% · rank 19 of 366 · 32 games
Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?
2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.
-11.6 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions
Checking the attributed publisher rating…
| Metric | Observed rate | Games | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offensive efficiency | 100.2 | 32 | Points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Defensive efficiency | 112.6 | 32 | Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Two-point FG% | 47.3% | 32 | (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Opponent two-point FG% | 53.2% | 32 | Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Three-point FG% | 29.0% | 32 | 3PM / 3PA. |
| Opponent three-point FG% | 35.6% | 32 | Opponent 3PM / 3PA. |
| Three-point attempt share | 28.8% | 32 | 3PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade. |
| Opponent three-point attempt share | 38.4% | 32 | Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure. |
| Free-throw accuracy | 73.5% | 32 | FTM / FTA. |
| Opponent free-throw accuracy | 71.9% | 32 | Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill. |
| Assisted field-goal share | 44.7% | 32 | Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement. |
| Opponent assisted FG share | 53.4% | 32 | Opponent assists / FGM. |
Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.
2,355 source possession rows across 32 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.
42.5% · rank 19 of 366 · 32 games
Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?
18.3% · rank 92 of 366 · 32 games
Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?
35.0% · rank 349 of 366 · 32 games
Which matchups demand an extra box-out assignment?
46.2% · rank 355 of 366 · 32 games
Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?
These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 7 times in the selected window; Bakersfield won 4. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.
Mar 8, 2026 · road vs Cal Poly · L 76–108 · offense 92.2 / defense 131.0
Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.
| Game / venue | Result | Current opponent rank | Off. eff. | Def. eff. | Pace | eFG% | TO% | ORB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal PolyMar 8, 2026 · road | L 76–108 | 246 | 92.2 | 131.0 | 82.5 | 47.0 | 21.8 | 30.2 |
| CSU NorthridgeMar 6, 2026 · home | L 84–86 | 171 | 105.7 | 108.2 | 79.5 | 50.7 | 12.6 | 23.8 |
| Long Beach StMar 1, 2026 · home | L 87–88 | 265 | 117.3 | 118.6 | 74.2 | 55.9 | 12.1 | 21.2 |
| UC San DiegoFeb 27, 2026 · road | L 72–84 | 97 | 100.8 | 117.6 | 71.4 | 48.0 | 18.2 | 13.3 |
| FullertonFeb 22, 2026 · home | L 80–88 | 255 | 108.9 | 119.8 | 73.4 | 47.7 | 13.6 | 27.5 |
| UC RiversideFeb 20, 2026 · road | L 65–93 | 241 | 84.3 | 120.6 | 77.1 | 33.9 | 16.9 | 22.7 |
| Hawai'iFeb 13, 2026 · home | L 74–89 | 136 | 102.3 | 123.0 | 72.4 | 48.4 | 15.2 | 25.7 |
| FullertonFeb 8, 2026 · road | L 66–82 | 255 | 89.0 | 110.6 | 74.2 | 43.4 | 21.6 | 32.6 |
| UC IrvineFeb 6, 2026 · road | L 62–78 | 95 | 84.7 | 106.6 | 73.2 | 37.9 | 26.0 | 36.6 |
| UC DavisJan 31, 2026 · home | L 72–80 | 193 | 103.4 | 114.9 | 69.6 | 53.7 | 21.5 | 27.6 |
| Cal PolyJan 30, 2026 · home | L 79–104 | 246 | 101.8 | 134.1 | 77.6 | 54.5 | 21.9 | 36.8 |
| Hawai'iJan 23, 2026 · road | L 71–98 | 136 | 91.8 | 126.7 | 77.3 | 37.7 | 9.1 | 12.2 |
| UC San DiegoJan 17, 2026 · home | L 62–83 | 97 | 87.1 | 116.6 | 71.2 | 38.4 | 21.1 | 31.0 |
| Santa BarbaraJan 16, 2026 · home | L 69–75 | 143 | 111.5 | 121.2 | 61.9 | 49.1 | 12.9 | 33.3 |
| Long Beach StJan 11, 2026 · road | L 75–81 | 265 | 99.2 | 107.1 | 75.6 | 48.3 | 18.5 | 22.2 |
| UC RiversideJan 9, 2026 · home | W 67–66 | 241 | 95.6 | 94.2 | 70.1 | 41.9 | 21.4 | 41.5 |
| UC DavisJan 3, 2026 · road | W 81–79 | 193 | 112.9 | 110.1 | 71.7 | 47.6 | 13.9 | 33.3 |
| UC IrvineJan 1, 2026 · home | L 77–81 | 95 | 110.5 | 116.2 | 69.7 | 43.8 | 12.9 | 46.5 |
| IdahoDec 23, 2025 · home | W 64–63 | 214 | 97.8 | 96.2 | 65.5 | 54.5 | 19.9 | 22.6 |
| NobelDec 19, 2025 · home | W 97–66 | Unrated | 132.5 | 90.1 | 73.2 | 66.3 | 16.4 | 30.4 |
| PepperdineDec 14, 2025 · home | L 62–70 | 261 | 91.9 | 103.8 | 67.5 | 33.3 | 22.2 | 40.0 |
| N Dakota StDec 12, 2025 · home | L 69–80 | 128 | 94.2 | 109.2 | 73.3 | 40.6 | 21.8 | 35.7 |
| Santa BarbaraDec 7, 2025 · road | L 84–109 | 143 | 115.3 | 149.6 | 72.9 | 60.4 | 16.5 | 16.7 |
| CSU NorthridgeDec 5, 2025 · road | L 66–87 | 171 | 89.0 | 117.3 | 74.1 | 39.2 | 24.3 | 37.5 |
| Fresno StNov 30, 2025 · neutral | W 76–71 | 188 | 106.7 | 99.7 | 71.2 | 46.5 | 14.0 | 22.6 |
| Florida StNov 26, 2025 · road | L 59–89 | 81 | 72.8 | 109.8 | 81.1 | 39.8 | 34.5 | 36.1 |
| Miss Valley StNov 22, 2025 · home | W 86–70 | 365 | 114.9 | 93.5 | 74.9 | 47.5 | 13.4 | 38.1 |
| Portland StNov 18, 2025 · road | L 80–93 | 170 | 108.0 | 125.6 | 74.1 | 51.8 | 23.0 | 30.3 |
| Ole MissNov 15, 2025 · road | L 60–82 | 54 | 96.2 | 131.5 | 62.4 | 44.9 | 20.8 | 32.4 |
| W IllinoisNov 12, 2025 · home | W 74–58 | 362 | 110.4 | 86.5 | 67.0 | 49.2 | 19.4 | 40.0 |
| WhittierNov 6, 2025 · home | W 83–61 | Unrated | 101.0 | 74.2 | 82.2 | 44.8 | 13.4 | 37.5 |
| CaliforniaNov 4, 2025 · road | L 60–87 | 104 | 82.1 | 119.1 | 73.1 | 38.7 | 23.3 | 30.6 |
2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →
| Player | GP | MIN/G | PTS/G | REB/G | AST/G | TS% | Est. usage | Usage games | AST/TO | 3PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dailin SmithG | 30 | 29.3 | 16.5 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 51.4 | 28.4% | 30 | 0.5730 games | 16130 games |
| AJ GeorgeG | 30 | 28.1 | 8.2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 44.0 | 18.8% | 30 | 0.8830 games | 4830 games |
| Ronald JessamyF | 31 | 26.0 | 13.5 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 56.3 | 26.8% | 31 | 0.4331 games | 1531 games |
| Tom MarkF | 27 | 25.0 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 54.4 | 13.4% | 27 | 1.0827 games | 5527 games |
| Kadar WallerG | 32 | 20.5 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 45.3 | 11.3% | 32 | 2.1732 games | 2732 games |
| CJ HardyG | 22 | 28.1 | 12.4 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 57.1 | 22.2% | 22 | 1.2322 games | 6722 games |
| Mike PriceG | 31 | 18.2 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 45.7 | 21.5% | 31 | 0.6731 games | 9631 games |
| Pierre Geneste Jr.C | 26 | 18.9 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 0.3 | 56.4 | 8.8% | 26 | 0.3626 games | 026 games |
| Jaden AlexanderG | 20 | 19.6 | 9.3 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 55.6 | 23.6% | 20 | 0.3720 games | 3420 games |
| Bentley WallerG | 22 | 11.1 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 53.3 | 19.7% | 22 | 0.6422 games | 1922 games |
Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.
This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.
No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.
No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.
No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.
Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.
Checking the live schedule edition…
No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.
The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.
Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.
Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.
Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →