SSILVERMINECollege basketball stats
LIVE BOARD
2026–27 SEASON
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball

VCU

2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.

Independent preseason modelNo.39

+15.8 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions

2882025–26 recorded finals
114.9Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
99.2Adjusted defense · lower is better
68.3Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID

A second read on VCU.

Open model archive ↗

Checking the attributed publisher rating…

01 / Both ends of the floor

The possession profile.

28836 recorded games · 36 paired efficiency samples · pace 69.2Mean opponent adj. net 4.3 · 36 rated opponents
Offense

Effective FG%

53.6%36 games · higher is betterRank 92 / 366 · 75th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent effective FG%

49.0%36 games · lower is betterRank 80 / 366 · 78th favorable percentile
Offense

Turnover rate

15.1%36 games · lower is betterRank 79 / 366 · 79th favorable percentile
Defense

Turnovers forced

17.0%36 games · higher is betterRank 168 / 366 · 54th favorable percentile
Offense

Offensive rebound rate

31.6%36 games · higher is betterRank 158 / 366 · 57th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent offensive rebound rate

30.0%36 games · lower is betterRank 184 / 366 · 50th favorable percentile
Offense

Free-throw attempt rate

42.0%36 games · higher is betterRank 27 / 366 · 93th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

32.8%36 games · lower is betterRank 141 / 366 · 62th favorable percentile
Shooting and ball-movement detail
MetricObserved rateGamesDefinition
Offensive efficiency116.436Points per 100 estimated possessions.
Defensive efficiency103.336Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions.
Two-point FG%53.0%36(FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Opponent two-point FG%48.7%36Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Three-point FG%36.3%363PM / 3PA.
Opponent three-point FG%33.0%36Opponent 3PM / 3PA.
Three-point attempt share43.8%363PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade.
Opponent three-point attempt share35.1%36Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure.
Free-throw accuracy73.6%36FTM / FTA.
Opponent free-throw accuracy70.7%36Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill.
Assisted field-goal share51.9%36Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement.
Opponent assisted FG share50.8%36Opponent assists / FGM.

Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.

NCAA source context / 202526

What did the possessions look like?

Compare possession style →
1.155
Points / source possession
69.72
Source possessions / game
25.2%
Transition share
19.9%
Assisted share
2.2%
Garbage-time share

2,510 source possession rows across 36 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.

02 / The film queue

Turn a number into a question.

Full-season relative strengths and watch points
A relative strength

Free-throw attempt rate

42.0% · rank 27 of 366 · 36 games

Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?

A relative strength

Turnover rate

15.1% · rank 79 of 366 · 36 games

Where do turnovers occur under pressure, and who can relieve that pressure?

A closer look

Turnovers forced

17.0% · rank 168 of 366 · 36 games

Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?

A closer look

Opponent offensive rebound rate

30.0% · rank 184 of 366 · 36 games

Which matchups demand an extra box-out assignment?

These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 6 times in the selected window; VCU won 4. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.

03 / How the season moved

Read beyond the average.

● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Unadjusted efficiency by game. Focus a point to inspect it.60110160OldestNewest

Mar 22, 2026 · neutral vs Illinois · L 55–76 · offense 83.4 / defense 115.2

Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.

Open the game-by-game scouting log · 36 games
Game / venueResultCurrent opponent rankOff. eff.Def. eff.PaceeFG%TO%ORB%
IllinoisMar 22, 2026 · neutralL 5576783.4115.266.040.215.226.7
North CarolinaMar 19, 2026 · neutralW 827822107.1101.968.053.813.117.5
DaytonMar 15, 2026 · neutralW 706258108.496.064.650.07.716.2
Saint Joseph'sMar 14, 2026 · neutralW 7764108118.498.465.051.610.831.6
DuquesneMar 13, 2026 · neutralW 7166129109.6101.964.854.117.025.8
DaytonMar 7, 2026 · roadW 686258112.1102.260.756.911.517.2
George MasonMar 4, 2026 · homeW 706590115.1106.960.850.09.932.3
FordhamFeb 28, 2026 · homeW 8263187120.292.468.257.814.731.4
Saint LouisFeb 21, 2026 · roadL 75885597.3114.177.139.820.738.3
G WashingtonFeb 18, 2026 · homeW 8975110130.2109.768.460.611.725.0
RichmondFeb 14, 2026 · roadW 7867162111.695.969.951.715.727.8
La SalleFeb 11, 2026 · roadW 7768242116.7103.066.055.019.742.1
DaytonFeb 7, 2026 · homeW 997358119.888.382.753.114.528.2
FordhamFeb 4, 2026 · roadW 635918798.592.264.052.323.434.6
Loyola ChicagoJan 31, 2026 · homeW 8975202130.5110.068.255.110.332.4
RichmondJan 28, 2026 · homeW 7769162126.8113.660.751.911.538.7
DavidsonJan 24, 2026 · roadW 7569121121.8112.161.659.819.544.0
Saint Joseph'sJan 19, 2026 · homeW 7972108108.699.072.851.613.727.5
Rhode IslandJan 14, 2026 · roadW 8475158124.7111.467.460.07.425.8
George MasonJan 10, 2026 · roadL 808690120.1129.166.653.512.032.4
Saint LouisJan 8, 2026 · homeL 62715580.592.277.033.315.620.0
DuquesneJan 3, 2026 · roadW 9380129130.4112.271.363.916.834.5
St BonaventureDec 31, 2025 · homeW 8982125131.4121.167.759.410.320.0
RiderDec 23, 2025 · homeW 10079342138.6109.572.266.912.534.5
AmericanDec 19, 2025 · homeW 10583247148.9117.770.565.714.250.0
NiagaraDec 16, 2025 · homeW 8458331133.692.262.964.815.936.7
New MexicoDec 11, 2025 · homeL 788140111.6115.969.944.417.241.5
SamfordDec 6, 2025 · homeW 8357147118.281.270.253.817.140.5
Virginia TechNov 28, 2025 · neutralW 866879121.796.270.762.319.833.3
VanderbiltNov 27, 2025 · neutralL 74892998.5118.475.242.017.321.4
South FloridaNov 26, 2025 · neutralW 786676107.891.272.444.415.238.1
Coppin StNov 23, 2025 · homeW 10158364135.677.974.562.310.731.0
NC StateNov 18, 2025 · roadL 798545107.3115.573.650.816.327.9
Saint Peter'sNov 13, 2025 · homeW 7861250114.289.368.353.124.939.4
Utah StateNov 8, 2025 · neutralL 778030100.9104.876.350.824.937.8
WagnerNov 4, 2025 · homeW 10374313135.497.376.160.313.141.0
04 / The people behind the possessions

Personnel and workload.

Full player index →

2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →

PlayerGPMIN/GPTS/GREB/GAST/GTS%Est. usageUsage gamesAST/TO3PA
Lazar DjokovicF3527.613.25.21.161.822.0%350.7335 games6735 games
Barry EvansF3626.67.24.92.150.615.4%361.9536 games8236 games
Terrence Hill Jr.G3625.115.02.72.862.226.4%362.5536 games21936 games
Brandon JenningsG3624.98.53.62.157.217.6%361.5836 games5836 games
Nyk LewisG3523.78.74.51.656.518.2%351.6535 games12735 games
Michael BelleF3622.47.35.01.158.416.1%361.1236 games4036 games
Jadrian TraceyG3621.99.62.81.853.923.9%361.0036 games17236 games
Tyrell WardG3113.75.72.20.554.822.3%310.5431 games6231 games
Ahmad NowellG2810.54.51.20.662.219.2%281.2128 games5828 games
Keyshawn MitchellF2010.63.22.60.551.416.5%201.1120 games2420 games

Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.

05 / Recruiting evidence

What changed around VCU?

Open the full recruiting file →Build a role shortlist →

This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.

13Source-listed players
12Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
87%Prior minutes represented
Role workload watch

Which source-listed role is represented?

Open roster lab →

Prior minutes are grouped by the source-reported position on the current listing. “Unrepresented” means prior minutes not attached to a same-program listing in this release; it does not establish a departure, transfer, eligibility or expected role.

RoleListedPrior minutesReturning minutesIncoming prior minutesReturning shareUnrepresented
Guard74,2114,211100%
Forward62,0582,058100%
Center0

0 listed players have no recognized source position. The workload denominator is the matched prior-production sample (6,269 minutes).

No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.

No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.

Roster observation

Who is listed in the source release?

Rank this roster’s workload →

13 source-listed players. Prior rates below are attached by exact source ID where available; missing values remain missing.

PlayerObservationPrior MPGPrior PPGPrior TS%
Lazar DjokovicFSame programVCU Rams27.613.261.8%
Terrence Hill Jr.GSame programVCU Rams25.115.062.2%
Brandon JenningsGSame programVCU Rams24.98.557.2%
Nyk LewisGSame programVCU Rams23.78.756.5%
Michael BelleFSame programVCU Rams22.47.358.4%
Jadrian TraceyGSame programVCU Rams21.99.653.9%
Tyrell WardGSame programVCU Rams13.75.754.8%
Ahmad NowellGSame programVCU Rams10.54.562.2%
Keyshawn MitchellFSame programVCU Rams10.63.251.4%
Jordan TilleryGSame programVCU Rams7.34.765.7%
Christian FerminFSame programVCU Rams12.80.826.1%
Jordann DumontFSame programVCU Rams2.40.940.2%

Showing the 12 highest prior-minute records. Open the full roster board for every source-listed player.

Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.

Look ahead / 2026–27

The next assignments.

Full published slate →

Checking the live schedule edition…

NEUTRAL FLOORNov 23, 9:00 PM ET

VCU vs Providence

79.0VCU
75.0Providence
Providence win estimate43.0%
Model signalToss-up
Projected home margin-4.1
Projected total154.0
80% home-margin range-20.0 to 11.9
Estimated possessions69.9
Why the model tiltsfour-factor edge
Shot qualityHome 2.8 pts
Providence attack 54.2% · VCU defense 47.6%
VCU attack 53.1% · Providence defense 49.3%
Ball securityHome 2.3 pts
Providence attack 17.3% · VCU defense 18.2%
VCU attack 16.5% · Providence defense 15.2%
Second chancesAway 1.0 pts
Providence attack 31.9% · VCU defense 29.2%
VCU attack 32.0% · Providence defense 28.4%
Free-throw pressureAway 3.7 pts
Providence attack 36.3% · VCU defense 34.0%
VCU attack 38.3% · Providence defense 32.3%
Opponent-adjusted rates from the 202526 season. Positive edge favors the home side; defensive direction follows the factor (lower allowed shooting, rebounding and free-throw rates, higher forced-turnover rate).

Lahaina Civic Center
Preseason baseline · roster changes are not model features.
No verified pregame market line imported. Check the forecast record →

Read the matchup brief →Open ESPN source game ↗

Read the evidence correctly.

The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.

Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.

Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.

Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →