SSILVERMINECollege basketball stats
LIVE BOARD
2026–27 SEASON
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball

Oregon

2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.

Independent preseason modelNo.61

+11.4 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions

12202025–26 recorded finals
112.3Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
101.0Adjusted defense · lower is better
67.6Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID

A second read on Oregon.

Open model archive ↗

Checking the attributed publisher rating…

01 / Both ends of the floor

The possession profile.

122032 recorded games · 32 paired efficiency samples · pace 66.5Mean opponent adj. net 12.5 · 32 rated opponents
Offense

Effective FG%

49.5%32 games · higher is betterRank 296 / 366 · 19th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent effective FG%

50.9%32 games · lower is betterRank 178 / 366 · 52th favorable percentile
Offense

Turnover rate

17.6%32 games · lower is betterRank 257 / 366 · 30th favorable percentile
Defense

Turnovers forced

15.7%32 games · higher is betterRank 252 / 366 · 31th favorable percentile
Offense

Offensive rebound rate

32.3%32 games · higher is betterRank 136 / 366 · 63th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent offensive rebound rate

32.3%32 games · lower is betterRank 291 / 366 · 21th favorable percentile
Offense

Free-throw attempt rate

35.0%32 games · higher is betterRank 184 / 366 · 50th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

32.0%32 games · lower is betterRank 115 / 366 · 69th favorable percentile
Shooting and ball-movement detail
MetricObserved rateGamesDefinition
Offensive efficiency106.132Points per 100 estimated possessions.
Defensive efficiency110.832Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions.
Two-point FG%50.5%32(FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Opponent two-point FG%51.5%32Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Three-point FG%32.1%323PM / 3PA.
Opponent three-point FG%33.4%32Opponent 3PM / 3PA.
Three-point attempt share42.8%323PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade.
Opponent three-point attempt share42.1%32Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure.
Free-throw accuracy73.0%32FTM / FTA.
Opponent free-throw accuracy78.7%32Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill.
Assisted field-goal share59.0%32Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement.
Opponent assisted FG share52.9%32Opponent assists / FGM.

Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.

NCAA source context / 202526

What did the possessions look like?

Compare possession style →
1.053
Points / source possession
67.16
Source possessions / game
15.7%
Transition share
21.3%
Assisted share
1.6%
Garbage-time share

2,149 source possession rows across 32 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.

02 / The film queue

Turn a number into a question.

Full-season relative strengths and watch points
A relative strength

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

32.0% · rank 115 of 366 · 32 games

Which defenders can protect the paint without surrendering free throws?

A relative strength

Offensive rebound rate

32.3% · rank 136 of 366 · 32 games

Who crashes the glass, and how does that affect transition defense?

A closer look

Opponent offensive rebound rate

32.3% · rank 291 of 366 · 32 games

Which matchups demand an extra box-out assignment?

A closer look

Effective FG%

49.5% · rank 296 of 366 · 32 games

Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?

These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 7 times in the selected window; Oregon won 3. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.

03 / How the season moved

Read beyond the average.

● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Unadjusted efficiency by game. Focus a point to inspect it.60110160OldestNewest

Mar 10, 2026 · neutral vs Maryland · L 60–70 · offense 95.6 / defense 111.5

Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.

Open the game-by-game scouting log · 32 games
Game / venueResultCurrent opponent rankOff. eff.Def. eff.PaceeFG%TO%ORB%
MarylandMar 10, 2026 · neutralL 60706395.6111.562.840.412.721.9
WashingtonMar 8, 2026 · homeW 857966129.7120.565.662.312.225.8
IllinoisMar 4, 2026 · roadL 5480778.9116.968.536.711.720.9
NorthwesternFeb 28, 2026 · roadL 62635397.398.963.744.925.143.2
WisconsinFeb 26, 2026 · homeW 857121122.8102.569.260.211.617.9
USCFeb 21, 2026 · roadW 717072101.399.870.149.021.426.7
MinnesotaFeb 18, 2026 · homeL 44619173.5101.959.939.620.119.4
Penn StateFeb 14, 2026 · homeW 8372103126.5109.765.664.622.934.6
IndianaFeb 10, 2026 · roadL 749244111.5138.766.450.99.025.0
PurdueFeb 7, 2026 · roadL 6468996.6102.766.249.119.622.6
IowaFeb 2, 2026 · homeL 668428111.5142.059.246.415.240.6
UCLAJan 29, 2026 · homeL 57732792.5118.561.643.216.228.2
WashingtonJan 25, 2026 · roadL 57726688.7112.164.239.315.63.6
Michigan StJan 21, 2026 · homeL 52681387.8114.859.346.116.921.9
MichiganJan 17, 2026 · homeL 71816105.3120.167.446.916.338.5
NebraskaJan 14, 2026 · roadL 55902485.7140.364.247.924.921.2
Ohio StateJan 9, 2026 · homeL 62722598.9114.862.738.511.234.9
RutgersJan 6, 2026 · roadL 8588107115.1119.165.755.323.042.1
MarylandJan 3, 2026 · roadW 64546398.783.364.854.321.625.0
OmahaDec 29, 2025 · homeW 8057238125.789.663.754.412.643.9
GonzagaDec 21, 2025 · neutralL 82918121.1134.367.757.516.229.0
PortlandDec 18, 2025 · homeW 9469258119.387.678.858.619.030.3
UC DavisDec 13, 2025 · homeW 10462193143.685.672.468.916.650.0
UCLADec 6, 2025 · roadL 637427103.8121.960.740.418.144.7
USCDec 3, 2025 · homeL 778272112.2119.568.656.620.432.3
CreightonNov 27, 2025 · neutralL 66764797.6112.467.642.813.337.2
San Diego StNov 26, 2025 · neutralL 809743113.7137.970.450.018.535.0
AuburnNov 25, 2025 · neutralL 738415104.4120.169.945.125.747.6
Oregon StNov 18, 2025 · homeW 8775139127.6110.068.256.614.743.8
S Dakota StNov 13, 2025 · homeW 8369161117.597.770.657.314.223.5
RiceNov 8, 2025 · homeW 6763224100.594.566.639.418.042.1
Hawai'iNov 5, 2025 · homeW 605913679.378.075.737.927.739.5
04 / The people behind the possessions

Personnel and workload.

Full player index →

2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →

PlayerGPMIN/GPTS/GREB/GAST/GTS%Est. usageUsage gamesAST/TO3PA
Takai SimpkinsG3132.012.52.92.456.221.2%311.1431 games14031 games
Kwame Evans Jr.F3031.013.37.42.058.122.4%301.0430 games10230 games
Nate BittleC2531.116.86.92.656.328.1%251.1625 games11325 games
Sean StewartF3223.06.55.21.252.116.6%321.0332 games132 games
Dezdrick LindsayF3220.55.32.81.548.416.0%321.8132 games5832 games
Wei LinG3017.56.60.91.748.223.6%301.4330 games10530 games
Jackson ShelstadG1234.915.62.94.951.623.3%122.8112 games10512 games
Drew CarterG2514.82.71.10.855.411.6%251.0525 games4625 games
Jamari PhillipsG2611.32.70.90.545.516.2%261.0026 games6126 games
Devon PryorF1618.12.92.51.247.910.0%162.1116 games1816 games

Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.

05 / Recruiting evidence

What changed around Oregon?

Open the full recruiting file →Build a role shortlist →

This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.

0Source-listed players
0Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
Prior minutes represented
Dated school publications

10 announced additions

0 exact source-name matches in the roster release
PlayerEvidencePrior programPrior MPGPrior PPGLatest publication
Andrew MeadowCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Andrew Meadow as a 2026–27 addition.Boise StateBoise St · 20252630.012.1Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Dwayne AristodeCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Dwayne Aristode as a 2026–27 addition.ArizonaArizona · 20252613.33.8Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Fred PayneCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Fred Payne as a 2026–27 addition.Boston CollegeBoston College · 20252634.715.8Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Jasper JohnsonCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Jasper Johnson as a 2026–27 addition.KentuckyKentucky · 20252612.04.9Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Jerry Easter IICollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Jerry Easter II as a 2026–27 addition.USCUSC · 20252617.94.6Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Pharaoh ComptonCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Pharaoh Compton as a 2026–27 addition.San Diego StateSan Diego St · 20252613.87.5Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Seven SpurlockPrep additionAddition announcedOregon announced Seven Spurlock as a 2026–27 addition.Overtime EliteJun 1, 20261 dated record
Tajh ArizaPrep additionAddition announcedOregon announced Tajh Ariza as a 2026–27 addition.Link AcademyJun 1, 20261 dated record
Taylor Bol BowenCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Taylor Bol Bowen as a 2026–27 addition.AlabamaAlabama · 20252619.16.3Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Tyrone Riley IVCollege transferAddition announcedOregon announced Tyrone Riley IV as a 2026–27 addition.San FranciscoSan Francisco · 20252631.812.2Jun 1, 20261 dated record
Roster observation

Who is listed in the source release?

Rank this roster’s workload →

No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.

Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.

Look ahead / 2026–27

The next assignments.

Full published slate →

Checking the live schedule edition…

No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.

Read the evidence correctly.

The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.

Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.

Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.

Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →