SSILVERMINECollege basketball stats
LIVE BOARD
2026–27 SEASON
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball

Morgan St

2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.

Independent preseason modelNo.351

-17.2 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions

14162025–26 recorded finals
99.2Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
116.5Adjusted defense · lower is better
70.9Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID

A second read on Morgan St.

Open model archive ↗

Checking the attributed publisher rating…

01 / Both ends of the floor

The possession profile.

141630 recorded games · 30 paired efficiency samples · pace 71.3Mean opponent adj. net -11.6 · 28 rated opponents
Offense

Effective FG%

48.3%30 games · higher is betterRank 325 / 366 · 11th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent effective FG%

51.0%30 games · lower is betterRank 185 / 366 · 50th favorable percentile
Offense

Turnover rate

17.5%30 games · lower is betterRank 248 / 366 · 32th favorable percentile
Defense

Turnovers forced

16.9%30 games · higher is betterRank 172 / 366 · 53th favorable percentile
Offense

Offensive rebound rate

31.3%30 games · higher is betterRank 172 / 366 · 53th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent offensive rebound rate

33.3%30 games · lower is betterRank 318 / 366 · 13th favorable percentile
Offense

Free-throw attempt rate

41.8%30 games · higher is betterRank 30 / 366 · 92th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

50.0%30 games · lower is betterRank 363 / 366 · 1th favorable percentile
Shooting and ball-movement detail
MetricObserved rateGamesDefinition
Offensive efficiency105.130Points per 100 estimated possessions.
Defensive efficiency109.330Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions.
Two-point FG%47.6%30(FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Opponent two-point FG%52.8%30Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Three-point FG%33.1%303PM / 3PA.
Opponent three-point FG%31.5%30Opponent 3PM / 3PA.
Three-point attempt share35.7%303PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade.
Opponent three-point attempt share32.0%30Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure.
Free-throw accuracy74.2%30FTM / FTA.
Opponent free-throw accuracy68.8%30Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill.
Assisted field-goal share52.7%30Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement.
Opponent assisted FG share55.9%30Opponent assists / FGM.

Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.

NCAA source context / 202526

What did the possessions look like?

Compare possession style →
1.039
Points / source possession
72.43
Source possessions / game
23.0%
Transition share
18.0%
Assisted share
4.5%
Garbage-time share

2,173 source possession rows across 30 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.

02 / The film queue

Turn a number into a question.

Full-season relative strengths and watch points
A relative strength

Free-throw attempt rate

41.8% · rank 30 of 366 · 30 games

Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?

A relative strength

Turnovers forced

16.9% · rank 172 of 366 · 30 games

Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?

A closer look

Effective FG%

48.3% · rank 325 of 366 · 30 games

Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?

A closer look

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

50.0% · rank 363 of 366 · 30 games

Which defenders can protect the paint without surrendering free throws?

These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 10 times in the selected window; Morgan St won 5. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.

03 / How the season moved

Read beyond the average.

● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Unadjusted efficiency by game. Focus a point to inspect it.50110170OldestNewest

Mar 11, 2026 · neutral vs Delaware St · L 70–75 · offense 93.1 / defense 99.8

Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.

Open the game-by-game scouting log · 30 games
Game / venueResultCurrent opponent rankOff. eff.Def. eff.PaceeFG%TO%ORB%
Delaware StMar 11, 2026 · neutralL 707535993.199.866.835.212.028.6
Coppin StMar 6, 2026 · homeW 7066364101.795.968.846.916.029.3
Norfolk StMar 2, 2026 · homeW 9084252119.4111.475.461.411.99.7
HowardFeb 28, 2026 · homeL 598422381.9116.672.029.112.533.3
SC StateFeb 25, 2026 · roadW 9083343123.4113.873.064.621.936.8
Delaware StFeb 21, 2026 · homeW 8268359111.892.773.452.519.136.1
NC CentralFeb 17, 2026 · roadL 7680333104.3109.772.941.519.246.8
MD EasternFeb 7, 2026 · homeW 7971361118.0106.166.950.09.029.4
Coppin StJan 31, 2026 · roadW 8980364117.4105.575.855.418.534.3
Norfolk StJan 27, 2026 · roadW 7978252103.8102.576.154.618.412.1
HowardJan 24, 2026 · roadW 787722396.495.280.939.321.040.0
VA LynchburgJan 20, 2026 · homeW 12853366155.364.382.473.810.942.9
Delaware StJan 17, 2026 · roadW 8079359109.3108.073.250.015.024.3
NC CentralJan 12, 2026 · homeL 7889333113.6129.668.750.016.033.3
SC StateJan 10, 2026 · homeW 7267343108.0100.566.750.012.030.6
MD EasternJan 3, 2026 · roadL 496636173.498.966.737.322.519.4
PSU BrandywineDec 30, 2025 · homeW 9255Unrated139.483.366.067.913.630.0
LMUDec 23, 2025 · roadL 568316080.4119.169.733.824.443.5
San FranciscoDec 21, 2025 · roadL 64948993.2136.868.750.017.515.2
CaliforniaDec 20, 2025 · roadL 509710472.0139.669.536.820.216.2
NiagaraDec 13, 2025 · homeW 8173331120.9109.067.071.634.355.6
DePaulDec 10, 2025 · roadL 499213472.4136.067.722.729.644.7
LongwoodDec 6, 2025 · homeL 8084220107.1112.574.750.818.721.2
DrexelNov 25, 2025 · homeL 6671185102.1109.864.745.510.820.6
Old DominionNov 22, 2025 · roadL 568825484.0132.066.738.116.531.8
NC A&TNov 19, 2025 · homeL 7379318105.1113.869.549.27.213.5
MercyhurstNov 15, 2025 · roadL 7286305106.4127.167.739.223.651.4
UMBCNov 11, 2025 · homeL 7981225110.0112.871.849.312.534.1
Central PennNov 6, 2025 · homeW 10177Unrated124.294.781.360.320.941.9
GeorgetownNov 3, 2025 · roadL 708710592.8115.375.545.721.229.7
04 / The people behind the possessions

Personnel and workload.

Full player index →

2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →

PlayerGPMIN/GPTS/GREB/GAST/GTS%Est. usageUsage gamesAST/TO3PA
Rob LawsonG3032.812.83.64.047.823.3%301.5930 games13330 games
Elijah DavisG2634.913.83.35.951.822.0%262.2526 games2326 games
Christian MeeksG3028.65.95.80.858.410.3%300.8130 games930 games
Alfred Worrell Jr.G3028.517.43.81.156.929.4%300.5730 games22330 games
Eugene AlvinF2919.37.33.60.455.118.5%290.5729 games7329 games
Walter Peggs Jr.G2819.28.82.00.754.422.0%281.0528 games12828 games
Christian OliverC2614.34.33.00.459.314.3%260.7126 games926 games
Marland HarrisF2012.93.93.80.358.414.9%200.3820 games020 games
David BumpassG229.13.21.00.244.820.7%220.4422 games2422 games

Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.

05 / Recruiting evidence

What changed around Morgan St?

Open the full recruiting file →Build a role shortlist →

This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.

0Source-listed players
0Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
Prior minutes represented

No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.

No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.

Roster observation

Who is listed in the source release?

Rank this roster’s workload →

No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.

Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.

Look ahead / 2026–27

The next assignments.

Full published slate →

Checking the live schedule edition…

No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.

Read the evidence correctly.

The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.

Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.

Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.

Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →