A relative strength
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
30.5% · rank 86 of 366 · 32 games
Which defenders can protect the paint without surrendering free throws?
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball
La Salle
2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.
Independent preseason modelNo.242
-5.6 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions
9–232025–26 recorded finals
103.6Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
109.2Adjusted defense · lower is better
67.8Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID
A second read on La Salle.
Checking the attributed publisher rating…
01 / Both ends of the floor
The possession profile.
9–2332 recorded games · 32 paired efficiency samples · pace 66.5Mean opponent adj. net 3.8 · 31 rated opponents
Offense
Effective FG%
45.7%32 games · higher is betterRank 359 / 366 · 2th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent effective FG%
54.1%32 games · lower is betterRank 327 / 366 · 11th favorable percentileOffense
Turnover rate
18.2%32 games · lower is betterRank 285 / 366 · 22th favorable percentileDefense
Turnovers forced
17.2%32 games · higher is betterRank 153 / 366 · 58th favorable percentileOffense
Offensive rebound rate
33.8%32 games · higher is betterRank 91 / 366 · 75th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent offensive rebound rate
31.7%32 games · lower is betterRank 270 / 366 · 26th favorable percentileOffense
Free-throw attempt rate
36.9%32 games · higher is betterRank 124 / 366 · 66th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
30.5%32 games · lower is betterRank 86 / 366 · 77th favorable percentileShooting and ball-movement detail
| Metric | Observed rate | Games | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offensive efficiency | 100.9 | 32 | Points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Defensive efficiency | 111.3 | 32 | Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Two-point FG% | 46.1% | 32 | (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Opponent two-point FG% | 54.0% | 32 | Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Three-point FG% | 29.8% | 32 | 3PM / 3PA. |
| Opponent three-point FG% | 36.3% | 32 | Opponent 3PM / 3PA. |
| Three-point attempt share | 31.5% | 32 | 3PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade. |
| Opponent three-point attempt share | 42.3% | 32 | Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure. |
| Free-throw accuracy | 72.4% | 32 | FTM / FTA. |
| Opponent free-throw accuracy | 68.9% | 32 | Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill. |
| Assisted field-goal share | 55.7% | 32 | Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement. |
| Opponent assisted FG share | 61.0% | 32 | Opponent assists / FGM. |
Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.
NCAA source context / 2025–26
What did the possessions look like?
2,155 source possession rows across 32 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.
02 / The film queue
Turn a number into a question.
A relative strength
Offensive rebound rate
33.8% · rank 91 of 366 · 32 games
Who crashes the glass, and how does that affect transition defense?
A closer look
Opponent effective FG%
54.1% · rank 327 of 366 · 32 games
What coverages and lineups account for the shot quality opponents receive?
A closer look
Effective FG%
45.7% · rank 359 of 366 · 32 games
Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?
These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 8 times in the selected window; La Salle won 4. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.
03 / How the season moved
Read beyond the average.
● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Mar 11, 2026 · neutral vs St Bonaventure · L 80–99 · offense 112.3 / defense 138.9
Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.
Open the game-by-game scouting log · 32 games
| Game / venue | Result | Current opponent rank | Off. eff. | Def. eff. | Pace | eFG% | TO% | ORB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St BonaventureMar 11, 2026 · neutral | L 80–99 | 125 | 112.3 | 138.9 | 71.3 | 46.2 | 15.4 | 40.0 |
| Saint Joseph'sMar 7, 2026 · road | L 76–88 | 108 | 110.5 | 128.0 | 68.8 | 44.8 | 7.3 | 34.1 |
| FordhamMar 4, 2026 · home | W 87–84 | 187 | 128.7 | 124.3 | 67.6 | 53.2 | 14.8 | 42.4 |
| DavidsonMar 1, 2026 · road | L 64–71 | 121 | 95.0 | 105.3 | 67.4 | 38.7 | 14.8 | 22.2 |
| G WashingtonFeb 24, 2026 · home | L 77–104 | 110 | 106.3 | 143.5 | 72.5 | 50.9 | 19.3 | 30.8 |
| Rhode IslandFeb 21, 2026 · home | W 59–46 | 158 | 95.8 | 74.7 | 61.6 | 36.5 | 22.7 | 43.9 |
| DuquesneFeb 19, 2026 · road | L 61–62 | 129 | 88.1 | 89.5 | 69.2 | 45.5 | 26.0 | 33.3 |
| VCUFeb 11, 2026 · home | L 68–77 | 39 | 103.0 | 116.7 | 66.0 | 42.6 | 9.1 | 28.9 |
| Saint LouisFeb 7, 2026 · road | L 58–82 | 55 | 82.0 | 115.9 | 70.8 | 35.2 | 19.8 | 33.3 |
| Loyola ChicagoFeb 4, 2026 · road | L 61–71 | 202 | 89.8 | 104.5 | 68.0 | 46.2 | 17.7 | 17.6 |
| Saint Joseph'sJan 31, 2026 · home | L 58–67 | 108 | 88.9 | 102.7 | 65.3 | 41.0 | 12.3 | 29.5 |
| FordhamJan 29, 2026 · road | L 58–64 | 187 | 94.8 | 104.6 | 61.2 | 37.3 | 14.7 | 33.3 |
| DaytonJan 21, 2026 · home | W 67–64 | 58 | 104.0 | 99.3 | 64.4 | 52.1 | 23.3 | 32.3 |
| St BonaventureJan 17, 2026 · home | W 78–74 | 125 | 123.1 | 116.7 | 63.4 | 67.4 | 26.8 | 38.9 |
| RichmondJan 15, 2026 · road | L 53–74 | 162 | 80.3 | 112.2 | 66.0 | 38.7 | 13.6 | 19.5 |
| Saint LouisJan 10, 2026 · home | L 72–84 | 55 | 106.7 | 124.5 | 67.5 | 41.8 | 10.4 | 33.3 |
| Rhode IslandJan 8, 2026 · road | W 79–72 | 158 | 123.2 | 112.3 | 64.1 | 69.5 | 20.3 | 36.4 |
| G WashingtonJan 3, 2026 · road | L 55–77 | 110 | 84.7 | 118.6 | 64.9 | 42.7 | 15.4 | 18.4 |
| George MasonDec 31, 2025 · home | L 75–80 | 90 | 118.9 | 126.9 | 63.1 | 45.2 | 6.3 | 33.3 |
| MichiganDec 21, 2025 · road | L 50–102 | 6 | 66.9 | 136.6 | 74.7 | 29.5 | 25.4 | 31.0 |
| High PointDec 20, 2025 · road | L 72–84 | 80 | 109.5 | 127.8 | 65.8 | 47.9 | 18.3 | 30.0 |
| Long IslandDec 13, 2025 · road | L 60–70 | 269 | 90.8 | 105.9 | 66.1 | 45.1 | 27.2 | 47.4 |
| DrexelDec 6, 2025 · home | W 69–64 | 185 | 104.1 | 96.6 | 66.3 | 51.8 | 15.1 | 32.4 |
| MerrimackNov 30, 2025 · neutral | L 60–66 | 180 | 94.7 | 104.1 | 63.4 | 44.2 | 30.0 | 50.0 |
| PennNov 29, 2025 · road | L 71–73 | 203 | 111.0 | 114.2 | 63.9 | 46.5 | 15.6 | 46.3 |
| HofstraNov 28, 2025 · neutral | L 58–63 | 115 | 87.3 | 94.8 | 66.5 | 42.2 | 21.1 | 34.3 |
| Lncstr BibleNov 22, 2025 · home | W 75–46 | Unrated | 107.0 | 65.7 | 70.1 | 54.0 | 18.6 | 36.4 |
| VillanovaNov 20, 2025 · home | L 55–70 | 36 | 92.5 | 117.7 | 59.5 | 46.1 | 26.9 | 39.4 |
| Penn StateNov 15, 2025 · neutral | L 69–83 | 103 | 108.4 | 130.3 | 63.7 | 57.0 | 23.6 | 29.6 |
| TempleNov 12, 2025 · road | L 63–90 | 142 | 94.7 | 135.3 | 66.5 | 40.7 | 15.0 | 24.3 |
| MonmouthNov 8, 2025 · home | W 73–60 | 211 | 110.3 | 90.7 | 66.2 | 41.9 | 18.1 | 45.5 |
| Coppin StNov 5, 2025 · home | W 87–59 | 364 | 118.2 | 80.2 | 73.6 | 56.6 | 19.0 | 34.4 |
04 / The people behind the possessions
Personnel and workload.
2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →
| Player | GP | MIN/G | PTS/G | REB/G | AST/G | TS% | Est. usage | Usage games | AST/TO | 3PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashton WalkerG | 32 | 27.6 | 8.2 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 47.5 | 18.6% | 32 | 1.9632 games | 7632 games |
| Rob DockeryG | 32 | 27.2 | 12.5 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 58.3 | 25.3% | 32 | 0.8232 games | 5632 games |
| Jaeden MarshallG | 25 | 27.7 | 12.0 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 52.8 | 23.1% | 25 | 1.1125 games | 13625 games |
| Jaden JohnsonG | 19 | 29.9 | 6.3 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 38.8 | 16.3% | 19 | 2.8519 games | 2319 games |
| Truth HarrisG | 23 | 23.9 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 45.5 | 17.3% | 23 | 1.3823 games | 10923 games |
| Josiah HarrisF | 27 | 19.8 | 8.4 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 50.1 | 25.6% | 27 | 0.2827 games | 027 games |
| Jerome Brewer Jr.F | 19 | 26.7 | 11.2 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 55.6 | 21.4% | 19 | 0.7619 games | 6219 games |
| Eric AckerG | 26 | 19.0 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 50.1 | 19.2% | 26 | 1.2226 games | 5526 games |
| Edwin DanielF | 31 | 14.4 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 49.9 | 16.8% | 31 | 0.3931 games | 331 games |
| Justin ArcherF | 12 | 19.7 | 6.2 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 59.1 | 14.8% | 12 | 0.5012 games | 012 games |
| Damon StrandG | 22 | 10.6 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 44.2 | 16.6% | 22 | 1.6722 games | 4722 games |
| Nas HartF | 20 | 10.6 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 42.5 | 13.5% | 20 | 0.0020 games | 020 games |
Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.
05 / Recruiting evidence
What changed around La Salle?
This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.
0Source-listed players
0Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
—Prior minutes represented
No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.
No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.
Roster observation
Who is listed in the source release?
No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.
Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.
Look ahead / 2026–27
The next assignments.
Checking the live schedule edition…
No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.
Read the evidence correctly.
The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.
Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.
Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.
Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →