A relative strength
Free-throw attempt rate
42.0% · rank 26 of 366 · 33 games
Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball
George Mason
2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.
Independent preseason modelNo.90
+7.9 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions
23–102025–26 recorded finals
109.4Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
101.5Adjusted defense · lower is better
65.5Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID
A second read on George Mason.
Checking the attributed publisher rating…
01 / Both ends of the floor
The possession profile.
23–1033 recorded games · 33 paired efficiency samples · pace 64.9Mean opponent adj. net 2.0 · 32 rated opponents
Offense
Effective FG%
53.1%33 games · higher is betterRank 111 / 366 · 70th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent effective FG%
49.5%33 games · lower is betterRank 104 / 366 · 72th favorable percentileOffense
Turnover rate
16.3%33 games · lower is betterRank 157 / 366 · 57th favorable percentileDefense
Turnovers forced
15.6%33 games · higher is betterRank 259 / 366 · 29th favorable percentileOffense
Offensive rebound rate
31.6%33 games · higher is betterRank 159 / 366 · 57th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent offensive rebound rate
28.2%33 games · lower is betterRank 93 / 366 · 75th favorable percentileOffense
Free-throw attempt rate
42.0%33 games · higher is betterRank 26 / 366 · 93th favorable percentileDefense
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
28.4%33 games · lower is betterRank 46 / 366 · 88th favorable percentileShooting and ball-movement detail
| Metric | Observed rate | Games | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offensive efficiency | 112.9 | 33 | Points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Defensive efficiency | 104.5 | 33 | Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions. |
| Two-point FG% | 54.3% | 33 | (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Opponent two-point FG% | 50.0% | 33 | Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA). |
| Three-point FG% | 34.0% | 33 | 3PM / 3PA. |
| Opponent three-point FG% | 32.6% | 33 | Opponent 3PM / 3PA. |
| Three-point attempt share | 34.8% | 33 | 3PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade. |
| Opponent three-point attempt share | 42.0% | 33 | Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure. |
| Free-throw accuracy | 73.2% | 33 | FTM / FTA. |
| Opponent free-throw accuracy | 70.9% | 33 | Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill. |
| Assisted field-goal share | 49.6% | 33 | Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement. |
| Opponent assisted FG share | 52.6% | 33 | Opponent assists / FGM. |
Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.
NCAA source context / 2025–26
What did the possessions look like?
2,158 source possession rows across 33 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.
02 / The film queue
Turn a number into a question.
A relative strength
Opponent free-throw attempt rate
28.4% · rank 46 of 366 · 33 games
Which defenders can protect the paint without surrendering free throws?
A closer look
Offensive rebound rate
31.6% · rank 159 of 366 · 33 games
Who crashes the glass, and how does that affect transition defense?
A closer look
Turnovers forced
15.6% · rank 259 of 366 · 33 games
Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?
These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 5 times in the selected window; George Mason won 4. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.
03 / How the season moved
Read beyond the average.
● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Mar 17, 2026 · home vs Liberty · L 71–77 · offense 112.8 / defense 122.3
Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.
Open the game-by-game scouting log · 33 games
| Game / venue | Result | Current opponent rank | Off. eff. | Def. eff. | Pace | eFG% | TO% | ORB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LibertyMar 17, 2026 · home | L 71–77 | 96 | 112.8 | 122.3 | 63.0 | 43.2 | 12.7 | 38.5 |
| St BonaventureMar 12, 2026 · neutral | L 57–63 | 125 | 93.7 | 103.5 | 60.9 | 47.4 | 16.4 | 29.4 |
| Saint LouisMar 7, 2026 · home | W 86–57 | 55 | 136.6 | 90.6 | 62.9 | 63.6 | 15.9 | 48.1 |
| VCUMar 4, 2026 · road | L 65–70 | 39 | 106.9 | 115.1 | 60.8 | 50.9 | 16.4 | 29.0 |
| St BonaventureFeb 28, 2026 · home | W 71–58 | 125 | 119.8 | 97.9 | 59.3 | 59.3 | 13.5 | 25.0 |
| Saint Joseph'sFeb 26, 2026 · road | L 63–81 | 108 | 97.7 | 125.7 | 64.5 | 44.8 | 17.1 | 35.3 |
| DaytonFeb 19, 2026 · home | L 67–82 | 58 | 106.8 | 130.8 | 62.7 | 51.0 | 14.4 | 16.7 |
| G WashingtonFeb 14, 2026 · road | L 53–72 | 110 | 90.2 | 122.6 | 58.8 | 48.0 | 18.7 | 22.6 |
| RichmondFeb 11, 2026 · road | L 70–82 | 162 | 99.8 | 116.9 | 70.1 | 44.6 | 21.4 | 38.5 |
| Saint Joseph'sFeb 7, 2026 · home | W 60–52 | 108 | 99.5 | 86.2 | 60.3 | 44.6 | 13.3 | 29.4 |
| DuquesneFeb 5, 2026 · home | L 65–71 | 129 | 100.7 | 110.0 | 64.6 | 55.9 | 26.3 | 30.0 |
| St BonaventureJan 31, 2026 · road | W 77–73 | 125 | 109.2 | 103.5 | 70.5 | 59.8 | 22.7 | 32.0 |
| DavidsonJan 29, 2026 · home | W 60–52 | 121 | 103.2 | 89.4 | 58.2 | 50.0 | 22.4 | 40.0 |
| Rhode IslandJan 24, 2026 · road | L 65–74 | 158 | 109.1 | 124.2 | 59.6 | 48.9 | 15.1 | 32.1 |
| G WashingtonJan 19, 2026 · home | W 69–64 | 110 | 102.4 | 95.0 | 67.4 | 57.1 | 19.3 | 13.8 |
| Loyola ChicagoJan 14, 2026 · road | W 82–74 | 202 | 129.2 | 116.6 | 63.5 | 54.4 | 11.0 | 43.3 |
| VCUJan 10, 2026 · home | W 86–80 | 39 | 129.1 | 120.1 | 66.6 | 59.1 | 10.5 | 23.1 |
| FordhamJan 8, 2026 · road | W 67–58 | 187 | 107.1 | 92.7 | 62.6 | 49.0 | 14.4 | 21.4 |
| Rhode IslandJan 3, 2026 · home | W 61–50 | 158 | 97.9 | 80.2 | 62.3 | 52.3 | 14.4 | 13.3 |
| La SalleDec 31, 2025 · road | W 80–75 | 242 | 126.9 | 118.9 | 63.1 | 52.7 | 0.0 | 24.2 |
| PennDec 28, 2025 · home | W 83–79 | 203 | 120.8 | 115.0 | 68.7 | 57.5 | 10.2 | 37.5 |
| Loyola MDDec 21, 2025 · home | W 86–79 | 330 | 128.1 | 117.7 | 67.1 | 52.7 | 10.4 | 36.4 |
| Old DominionDec 13, 2025 · home | W 73–61 | 254 | 102.5 | 85.7 | 71.2 | 44.6 | 15.5 | 23.7 |
| Virginia TechDec 6, 2025 · road | L 62–73 | 79 | 96.3 | 113.3 | 64.4 | 46.4 | 24.8 | 40.6 |
| CornellDec 3, 2025 · home | W 99–81 | 122 | 136.6 | 111.8 | 72.5 | 63.9 | 16.6 | 35.7 |
| James MadisonNov 29, 2025 · home | W 82–66 | 155 | 123.5 | 99.4 | 66.4 | 61.4 | 15.1 | 16.0 |
| FAUNov 26, 2025 · neutral | W 74–65 | 94 | 124.7 | 109.5 | 59.3 | 57.8 | 11.8 | 34.5 |
| OhioNov 24, 2025 · neutral | W 92–69 | 189 | 136.3 | 102.2 | 67.5 | 56.5 | 8.9 | 41.0 |
| JacksonvilleNov 19, 2025 · home | W 79–57 | 287 | 120.8 | 87.2 | 65.4 | 66.3 | 19.9 | 32.0 |
| New HampshireNov 15, 2025 · home | W 61–44 | 348 | 92.4 | 66.6 | 66.1 | 37.0 | 18.2 | 36.8 |
| CatawbaNov 12, 2025 · home | W 86–62 | Unrated | 124.2 | 89.5 | 69.2 | 69.5 | 30.3 | 50.0 |
| WinthropNov 8, 2025 · home | W 96–90 | 153 | 125.3 | 117.5 | 76.6 | 55.1 | 18.3 | 44.4 |
| WoffordNov 4, 2025 · home | W 70–46 | 197 | 107.5 | 70.7 | 65.1 | 52.7 | 18.4 | 26.7 |
04 / The people behind the possessions
Personnel and workload.
2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →
| Player | GP | MIN/G | PTS/G | REB/G | AST/G | TS% | Est. usage | Usage games | AST/TO | 3PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kory MincyG | 33 | 34.0 | 14.3 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 58.0 | 22.1% | 33 | 1.6833 games | 17533 games |
| Jahari LongG | 33 | 33.8 | 12.2 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 58.8 | 19.2% | 33 | 2.2633 games | 13033 games |
| Riley AllenspachF | 32 | 24.9 | 13.6 | 6.1 | 0.8 | 62.1 | 26.3% | 32 | 0.6632 games | 6732 games |
| Masai TroutmanG | 31 | 25.1 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 55.8 | 19.1% | 31 | 0.9531 games | 9631 games |
| Fatt HillG | 23 | 24.1 | 10.3 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 57.5 | 24.5% | 23 | 1.0023 games | 2523 games |
| Malik PresleyG | 33 | 16.1 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 52.4 | 12.5% | 33 | 1.0833 games | 2233 games |
| Emmanuel KangaF | 32 | 13.3 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 0.5 | 59.5 | 17.6% | 32 | 1.0032 games | 032 games |
| Nick EllingtonF | 31 | 12.9 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 59.2 | 18.8% | 31 | 0.4231 games | 131 games |
| Stas SivkaF | 29 | 11.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 50.7 | 12.9% | 29 | 1.0029 games | 3929 games |
| Dola AdebayoF | 27 | 11.6 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 51.5 | 17.9% | 27 | 0.6927 games | 2327 games |
| Devin BookerG | 25 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 38.1 | 16.9% | 25 | 0.5025 games | 3125 games |
Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.
05 / Recruiting evidence
What changed around George Mason?
This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.
0Source-listed players
0Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
—Prior minutes represented
No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.
No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.
Roster observation
Who is listed in the source release?
No source-listed roster rows were observed for this program in the current release.
Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.
Look ahead / 2026–27
The next assignments.
Checking the live schedule edition…
No upcoming games for this program in the partial schedule.
Read the evidence correctly.
The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.
Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.
Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.
Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →