SSILVERMINECollege basketball stats
LIVE BOARD
2026–27 SEASON
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball

Coppin St

2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.

Independent preseason modelNo.364

-25.0 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions

7242025–26 recorded finals
90.8Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
115.8Adjusted defense · lower is better
69.1Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID

A second read on Coppin St.

Open model archive ↗

Checking the attributed publisher rating…

01 / Both ends of the floor

The possession profile.

72431 recorded games · 31 paired efficiency samples · pace 69.4Mean opponent adj. net -5.7 · 30 rated opponents
Offense

Effective FG%

46.3%31 games · higher is betterRank 354 / 366 · 3th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent effective FG%

54.9%31 games · lower is betterRank 341 / 366 · 7th favorable percentile
Offense

Turnover rate

22.1%31 games · lower is betterRank 364 / 366 · 1th favorable percentile
Defense

Turnovers forced

17.9%31 games · higher is betterRank 111 / 366 · 70th favorable percentile
Offense

Offensive rebound rate

31.4%31 games · higher is betterRank 170 / 366 · 54th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent offensive rebound rate

34.4%31 games · lower is betterRank 339 / 366 · 7th favorable percentile
Offense

Free-throw attempt rate

37.8%31 games · higher is betterRank 97 / 366 · 74th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

42.0%31 games · lower is betterRank 334 / 366 · 9th favorable percentile
Shooting and ball-movement detail
MetricObserved rateGamesDefinition
Offensive efficiency94.031Points per 100 estimated possessions.
Defensive efficiency115.431Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions.
Two-point FG%46.5%31(FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Opponent two-point FG%53.5%31Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Three-point FG%30.5%313PM / 3PA.
Opponent three-point FG%37.8%31Opponent 3PM / 3PA.
Three-point attempt share35.2%313PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade.
Opponent three-point attempt share43.5%31Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure.
Free-throw accuracy67.4%31FTM / FTA.
Opponent free-throw accuracy74.4%31Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill.
Assisted field-goal share51.4%31Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement.
Opponent assisted FG share62.3%31Opponent assists / FGM.

Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.

NCAA source context / 202526

What did the possessions look like?

Compare possession style →
0.940
Points / source possession
70.10
Source possessions / game
18.0%
Transition share
16.7%
Assisted share
5.7%
Garbage-time share

2,173 source possession rows across 31 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.

02 / The film queue

Turn a number into a question.

Full-season relative strengths and watch points
A relative strength

Free-throw attempt rate

37.8% · rank 97 of 366 · 31 games

Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?

A relative strength

Turnovers forced

17.9% · rank 111 of 366 · 31 games

Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?

A closer look

Effective FG%

46.3% · rank 354 of 366 · 31 games

Which actions create the team's efficient looks, and which personnel can reproduce them?

A closer look

Turnover rate

22.1% · rank 364 of 366 · 31 games

Where do turnovers occur under pressure, and who can relieve that pressure?

These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 7 times in the selected window; Coppin St won 4. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.

03 / How the season moved

Read beyond the average.

● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Unadjusted efficiency by game. Focus a point to inspect it.60110160OldestNewest

Mar 6, 2026 · road vs Morgan St · L 66–70 · offense 95.9 / defense 101.7

Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.

Open the game-by-game scouting log · 31 games
Game / venueResultCurrent opponent rankOff. eff.Def. eff.PaceeFG%TO%ORB%
Morgan StMar 6, 2026 · roadL 667035195.9101.768.842.417.431.7
HowardMar 3, 2026 · roadL 709022398.9127.270.854.524.029.0
Norfolk StFeb 28, 2026 · homeL 6975252104.5113.666.042.413.643.6
MD EasternFeb 21, 2026 · homeW 716536196.488.365.446.725.836.4
SC StateFeb 16, 2026 · roadW 595734387.684.667.457.028.213.0
NC CentralFeb 14, 2026 · roadW 585633392.889.662.544.814.427.8
Delaware StFeb 7, 2026 · homeW 654735997.870.766.451.025.640.0
HowardFeb 2, 2026 · homeL 537222385.8116.661.837.521.044.4
Morgan StJan 31, 2026 · homeL 8089351105.5117.475.850.018.536.6
Norfolk StJan 24, 2026 · roadL 7610325294.7128.480.251.823.730.0
MD EasternJan 17, 2026 · roadL 6770361109.8114.861.049.032.857.1
SC StateJan 13, 2026 · homeL 7274343110.1113.265.446.021.440.5
NC CentralJan 10, 2026 · homeL 7788333117.7134.665.463.019.928.6
Delaware StJan 3, 2026 · roadW 535135980.777.765.748.028.928.1
UMBCDec 29, 2025 · homeL 599322581.9129.172.043.019.415.4
GeorgetownDec 22, 2025 · roadL 679710592.5133.972.447.519.327.5
NavyDec 19, 2025 · roadL 558818282.2131.467.039.320.926.3
RadfordDec 14, 2025 · roadL 7710721398.7137.278.055.429.527.3
Saint Joseph'sDec 10, 2025 · roadL 658710895.9128.367.847.416.218.2
LibertyDec 6, 2025 · roadL 50929673.6135.467.933.922.127.5
West VirginiaDec 4, 2025 · roadL 49915270.1130.269.934.321.523.1
Loyola MDNov 30, 2025 · roadL 8495330119.0134.670.661.018.428.0
RiderNov 26, 2025 · roadW 686534295.991.770.946.122.642.9
VCUNov 23, 2025 · roadL 581013977.9135.674.541.922.825.0
Central PennNov 18, 2025 · homeW 10362Unrated127.476.780.954.316.154.8
South AlabamaNov 15, 2025 · neutralL 627216593.1108.166.643.819.525.7
C MichiganNov 14, 2025 · neutralL 598226683.3115.870.837.118.429.5
South FloridaNov 13, 2025 · roadL 501007672.8145.768.632.726.230.8
James MadisonNov 9, 2025 · roadL 708415599.6119.570.346.825.634.3
La SalleNov 5, 2025 · roadL 598724280.2118.273.638.621.717.5
MarylandNov 3, 2025 · neutralL 61836389.4121.668.250.029.325.8
04 / The people behind the possessions

Personnel and workload.

Full player index →

2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →

PlayerGPMIN/GPTS/GREB/GAST/GTS%Est. usageUsage gamesAST/TO3PA
Hassan PerkinsG3122.66.61.52.954.116.8%311.9631 games7831 games
Khali HortonF3119.87.42.10.950.220.8%310.9331 games12731 games
Hussain WilliamsG3119.87.32.40.846.622.2%310.7731 games13731 games
Torrin AndrewsG3119.15.31.51.653.817.6%310.8631 games8231 games
Jamari PiercyG3118.36.82.30.848.223.2%310.5431 games4631 games
Demariontay HallF2222.010.65.40.553.826.9%220.2322 games322 games
Tyler KoenigF2816.95.33.80.454.317.4%280.3628 games128 games
Taj ThweattF2317.86.04.30.452.319.6%230.3423 games4723 games
Baasil SaundersG2615.53.21.90.744.114.8%260.7626 games1626 games
Nelson LamizanaF1719.26.63.00.954.320.7%170.4717 games2317 games
Camaren SparrowG1619.25.73.81.547.719.9%160.8616 games1416 games
Daveyon LydnerG2312.72.30.91.633.915.8%232.1823 games1723 games

Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.

05 / Recruiting evidence

What changed around Coppin St?

Open the full recruiting file →Build a role shortlist →

This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.

17Source-listed players
15Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
100%Prior minutes represented
Role workload watch

Which source-listed role is represented?

Open roster lab →

Prior minutes are grouped by the source-reported position on the current listing. “Unrepresented” means prior minutes not attached to a same-program listing in this release; it does not establish a departure, transfer, eligibility or expected role.

RoleListedPrior minutesReturning minutesIncoming prior minutesReturning shareUnrepresented
Guard93,5493,549100%
Forward72,4842,484100%
Center1192192100%

0 listed players have no recognized source position. The workload denominator is the matched prior-production sample (6,225 minutes).

No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.

No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.

Roster observation

Who is listed in the source release?

Rank this roster’s workload →

17 source-listed players. Prior rates below are attached by exact source ID where available; missing values remain missing.

PlayerObservationPrior MPGPrior PPGPrior TS%
Hassan PerkinsGSame programCoppin State Eagles22.66.654.1%
Khali HortonFSame programCoppin State Eagles19.87.450.2%
Hussain WilliamsGSame programCoppin State Eagles19.87.346.6%
Torrin AndrewsGSame programCoppin State Eagles19.15.353.8%
Jamari PiercyGSame programCoppin State Eagles18.36.848.2%
Demariontay HallFSame programCoppin State Eagles22.010.653.8%
Tyler KoenigFSame programCoppin State Eagles16.95.354.3%
Taj ThweattFSame programCoppin State Eagles17.86.052.3%
Baasil SaundersGSame programCoppin State Eagles15.53.244.1%
Nelson LamizanaFSame programCoppin State Eagles19.26.654.3%
Camaren SparrowGSame programCoppin State Eagles19.25.747.7%
Daveyon LydnerGSame programCoppin State Eagles12.72.333.9%

Showing the 12 highest prior-minute records. Open the full roster board for every source-listed player.

Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.

Look ahead / 2026–27

The next assignments.

Full published slate →

Checking the live schedule edition…

ON THE SCHEDULENov 21, 2026 · TIME TBD

Coppin St vs Georgetown

58.5Coppin St
83.4Georgetown
Georgetown win estimate94.7%
Model signalStrong lean
Projected home margin24.9
Projected total141.9
80% home-margin range8.9 to 40.8
Estimated possessions68.8
Why the model tiltsfour-factor edge
Shot qualityHome 0.1 pts
Georgetown attack 50.7% · Coppin St defense 54.9%
Coppin St attack 46.1% · Georgetown defense 50.3%
Ball securityHome 5.0 pts
Georgetown attack 16.6% · Coppin St defense 18.3%
Coppin St attack 20.5% · Georgetown defense 17.3%
Second chancesHome 1.3 pts
Georgetown attack 32.2% · Coppin St defense 33.9%
Coppin St attack 26.7% · Georgetown defense 29.7%
Free-throw pressureAway 7.1 pts
Georgetown attack 34.5% · Coppin St defense 38.8%
Coppin St attack 36.0% · Georgetown defense 33.2%
Opponent-adjusted rates from the 202526 season. Positive edge favors the home side; defensive direction follows the factor (lower allowed shooting, rebounding and free-throw rates, higher forced-turnover rate).

Capital One Arena
Preseason baseline · roster changes are not model features.
No verified pregame market line imported. Check the forecast record →

Read the matchup brief →Open ESPN source game ↗

Read the evidence correctly.

The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.

Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.

Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.

Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →