SSILVERMINECollege basketball stats
LIVE BOARD
2026–27 SEASON
← Program librarySource edition Sep 12, 2026
The program dossier / men’s basketball

Alcorn St

2025–26 performance, personnel and game context.
A starting point for 2026–27 preparation.

Independent preseason modelNo.353

-17.5 adjusted net
per 100 estimated possessions

9232025–26 recorded finals
97.4Adjusted offense · 2026–27 baseline
114.9Adjusted defense · lower is better
67.8Model tempo · possessions / 40 min
Publisher lens / exact source team ID

A second read on Alcorn St.

Open model archive ↗

Checking the attributed publisher rating…

01 / Both ends of the floor

The possession profile.

92332 recorded games · 32 paired efficiency samples · pace 69.4Mean opponent adj. net -6.4 · 32 rated opponents
Offense

Effective FG%

47.7%32 games · higher is betterRank 337 / 366 · 8th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent effective FG%

55.0%32 games · lower is betterRank 344 / 366 · 6th favorable percentile
Offense

Turnover rate

19.6%32 games · lower is betterRank 344 / 366 · 6th favorable percentile
Defense

Turnovers forced

18.1%32 games · higher is betterRank 105 / 366 · 72th favorable percentile
Offense

Offensive rebound rate

26.9%32 games · higher is betterRank 313 / 366 · 15th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent offensive rebound rate

35.5%32 games · lower is betterRank 356 / 366 · 3th favorable percentile
Offense

Free-throw attempt rate

31.8%32 games · higher is betterRank 262 / 366 · 28th favorable percentile
Defense

Opponent free-throw attempt rate

39.4%32 games · lower is betterRank 303 / 366 · 17th favorable percentile
Shooting and ball-movement detail
MetricObserved rateGamesDefinition
Offensive efficiency96.032Points per 100 estimated possessions.
Defensive efficiency115.132Opponent points per 100 estimated possessions.
Two-point FG%46.5%32(FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Opponent two-point FG%58.0%32Opponent (FGM − 3PM) / (FGA − 3PA).
Three-point FG%33.3%323PM / 3PA.
Opponent three-point FG%33.0%32Opponent 3PM / 3PA.
Three-point attempt share33.7%323PA / FGA; a style measure, not a quality grade.
Opponent three-point attempt share35.1%32Opponent 3PA / FGA; a style measure.
Free-throw accuracy70.8%32FTM / FTA.
Opponent free-throw accuracy72.7%32Opponent FTM / FTA; not attributed to defensive skill.
Assisted field-goal share46.6%32Assists / FGM; describes recorded ball movement.
Opponent assisted FG share55.7%32Opponent assists / FGM.

Window changes describe the historical sample; they do not refit the preseason model. Full-season ranks require 10 games. Percentiles compare qualifying programs in the model’s rated field. Source coverage can differ by metric.

NCAA source context / 202526

What did the possessions look like?

Compare possession style →
0.952
Points / source possession
70.06
Source possessions / game
18.9%
Transition share
15.8%
Assisted share
2.9%
Garbage-time share

2,242 source possession rows across 32 recorded team-games. These are descriptive NCAA source aggregates: they do not assign individual credit or enter the forecast.

02 / The film queue

Turn a number into a question.

Full-season relative strengths and watch points
A relative strength

Turnovers forced

18.1% · rank 105 of 366 · 32 games

Which defensive actions produce takeaways, and what shots do they concede?

A relative strength

Free-throw attempt rate

31.8% · rank 262 of 366 · 32 games

Who generates contact, and how do opponents keep them off the line?

A closer look

Turnover rate

19.6% · rank 344 of 366 · 32 games

Where do turnovers occur under pressure, and who can relieve that pressure?

A closer look

Opponent offensive rebound rate

35.5% · rank 356 of 366 · 32 games

Which matchups demand an extra box-out assignment?

These are stat-led film prompts, not verified explanations of a scheme. Lower-ranked factors can still be above average. A five-point-or-closer final occurred 8 times in the selected window; Alcorn St won 5. That small-sample record is not a clutch-skill estimate.

03 / How the season moved

Read beyond the average.

● Offense● Opponent offenseRaw points / 100 possessions · game order
Unadjusted efficiency by game. Focus a point to inspect it.50115180OldestNewest

Mar 10, 2026 · neutral vs Prairie View · L 56–65 · offense 84.2 / defense 97.7

Higher offense and lower opponent offense are better. Opponent strength and venue are not adjusted here. Missing paired boxes create gaps.

Open the game-by-game scouting log · 32 games
Game / venueResultCurrent opponent rankOff. eff.Def. eff.PaceeFG%TO%ORB%
Prairie ViewMar 10, 2026 · neutralL 566533684.297.766.538.316.519.4
Alabama StMar 9, 2026 · neutralW 7765322109.492.470.449.114.221.9
AR-Pine BluffMar 6, 2026 · homeL 488335764.5111.674.433.922.919.5
Miss Valley StMar 4, 2026 · homeW 6764365103.799.164.648.017.032.1
Prairie ViewFeb 28, 2026 · roadL 517233672.5102.370.435.519.912.8
Texas SouthernFeb 27, 2026 · roadL 8792320109.3115.670.850.015.129.3
Jackson StFeb 21, 2026 · homeW 8365345115.890.771.746.615.342.1
Florida A&MFeb 17, 2026 · homeL 7886335109.0120.171.650.915.426.7
BethuneFeb 14, 2026 · homeW 575530189.386.263.847.921.925.9
Miss Valley StFeb 10, 2026 · roadW 7466365126.0112.458.763.86.812.0
AR-Pine BluffFeb 7, 2026 · roadL 7784357116.2126.766.358.915.121.4
GramblingFeb 3, 2026 · homeL 507430779.5117.762.936.514.321.6
SouthernJan 31, 2026 · homeW 7873282120.0112.465.067.323.126.1
BethuneJan 27, 2026 · roadL 7382301103.5116.370.548.512.830.0
Florida A&MJan 24, 2026 · roadL 586633587.499.466.446.125.625.8
Prairie ViewJan 19, 2026 · homeW 7675336108.9107.469.845.018.647.6
Texas SouthernJan 17, 2026 · homeL 7172320109.6111.164.848.117.028.1
Alabama StJan 13, 2026 · roadL 668132292.3113.371.544.319.626.3
Alabama A&MJan 10, 2026 · roadW 646234699.095.964.646.613.925.7
Jackson StJan 3, 2026 · roadL 8689345122.6126.970.158.114.334.2
Ole MissDec 30, 2025 · roadL 43795464.2118.067.028.116.417.8
BaylorDec 20, 2025 · roadL 561133371.7144.678.133.817.926.4
Iowa StateDec 4, 2025 · roadL 68132584.6164.380.355.433.624.1
Louisiana TechNov 29, 2025 · roadL 588315691.9131.563.142.120.638.1
Indiana StNov 28, 2025 · neutralW 8174140101.692.879.755.625.138.2
OklahomaNov 23, 2025 · roadL 53723877.3105.068.645.327.720.0
LSUNov 19, 2025 · roadL 8110774111.1146.872.956.717.835.1
HowardNov 14, 2025 · roadL 647222395.7107.766.946.616.521.4
MarylandNov 12, 2025 · roadL 64846388.9116.672.052.829.225.8
MinnesotaNov 8, 2025 · roadL 50959171.6136.069.936.622.924.4
South AlabamaNov 7, 2025 · roadL 707616597.2105.572.055.525.023.3
Florida StNov 5, 2025 · roadL 7610881100.2142.475.958.827.729.0
04 / The people behind the possessions

Personnel and workload.

Full player index →

2025–26 recorded affiliations, independent of the split selector. This is not a confirmed 2026–27 roster. Inspect roster observations →

PlayerGPMIN/GPTS/GREB/GAST/GTS%Est. usageUsage gamesAST/TO3PA
Nick WoodardSF3228.78.64.21.348.318.6%320.8032 games10432 games
Shane LancasterG3228.610.82.32.256.819.2%321.8232 games14232 games
Jameel MorrisPG3029.511.22.52.953.221.9%301.3230 games6930 games
Tycen McDanielsF3227.212.06.11.057.924.3%320.3932 games832 games
Davian WilliamsPG3226.47.82.91.346.719.1%320.8632 games12032 games
Omari HamiltonF3221.47.84.50.552.420.6%320.4232 games4832 games
Travis RobertsSG3116.53.61.70.442.214.7%310.6931 games7931 games
Bryson CalamesePG3111.13.00.91.243.820.8%311.0931 games2831 games

Usage is a minutes-based estimate over the stated sample, not a direct measure of on-court possessions. Low-minute estimates are noisy. AST/TO is unavailable when recorded turnovers are zero; missing fields are never filled with zero.

05 / Recruiting evidence

What changed around Alcorn St?

Open the full recruiting file →Build a role shortlist →

This panel keeps dated school publications, source-listed roster observations and prior college production in separate evidence lanes. A source record does not establish eligibility, availability or a future role.

13Source-listed players
11Same-program prior records
0Different-program records
100%Prior minutes represented
Role workload watch

Which source-listed role is represented?

Open roster lab →

Prior minutes are grouped by the source-reported position on the current listing. “Unrepresented” means prior minutes not attached to a same-program listing in this release; it does not establish a departure, transfer, eligibility or expected role.

RoleListedPrior minutesReturning minutesIncoming prior minutesReturning shareUnrepresented
Guard83,6993,699100%
Forward52,7262,726100%
Center0

0 listed players have no recognized source position. The workload denominator is the matched prior-production sample (6,425 minutes).

No dated school announcement is in the selected review file for this program. The roster row below is observation-only; absence of a reviewed announcement does not mean the program made no move.

No announced additions are in the reviewed file for this program.

Roster observation

Who is listed in the source release?

Rank this roster’s workload →

13 source-listed players. Prior rates below are attached by exact source ID where available; missing values remain missing.

PlayerObservationPrior MPGPrior PPGPrior TS%
Nick WoodardSFSame programAlcorn State Braves28.78.648.3%
Shane LancasterGSame programAlcorn State Braves28.610.856.8%
Jameel MorrisPGSame programAlcorn State Braves29.511.253.2%
Tycen McDanielsFSame programAlcorn State Braves27.212.057.9%
Davian WilliamsPGSame programAlcorn State Braves26.47.846.7%
Omari HamiltonFSame programAlcorn State Braves21.47.852.4%
Travis RobertsSGSame programAlcorn State Braves16.53.642.2%
Bryson CalamesePGSame programAlcorn State Braves11.13.043.8%
Mike JonesSGSame programAlcorn State Braves15.03.541.6%
Jeremy EllisPFSame programAlcorn State Braves6.31.048.2%
William HendersonFSame programAlcorn State Braves10.42.642.2%
Alex HawkinsSGNo prior appearance observedNo prior program listed

Showing the 12 highest prior-minute records. Open the full roster board for every source-listed player.

Recruiting review edition Sep 8, 2026 · coverage is partial (14 programs reviewed). See the full methodology and coverage map before drawing a roster conclusion.

Look ahead / 2026–27

The next assignments.

Full published slate →

Checking the live schedule edition…

ON THE SCHEDULEDec 2, 2026 · TIME TBD

Alcorn St vs Iowa State

53.7Alcorn St
88.1Iowa State
Iowa State win estimate98.1%
Model signalStrong lean
Projected home margin34.4
Projected total141.7
80% home-margin range18.4 to 50.3
Estimated possessions67.7
Why the model tiltsfour-factor edge
Shot qualityHome 1.2 pts
Iowa State attack 55.3% · Alcorn St defense 54.8%
Alcorn St attack 47.7% · Iowa State defense 48.3%
Ball securityAway 2.4 pts
Iowa State attack 15.7% · Alcorn St defense 17.9%
Alcorn St attack 18.0% · Iowa State defense 22.5%
Second chancesAway 2.0 pts
Iowa State attack 33.8% · Alcorn St defense 33.5%
Alcorn St attack 29.1% · Iowa State defense 26.7%
Free-throw pressureHome 0.4 pts
Iowa State attack 36.3% · Alcorn St defense 35.8%
Alcorn St attack 31.9% · Iowa State defense 31.7%
Opponent-adjusted rates from the 202526 season. Positive edge favors the home side; defensive direction follows the factor (lower allowed shooting, rebounding and free-throw rates, higher forced-turnover rate).

Hilton Coliseum
Preseason baseline · roster changes are not model features.
No verified pregame market line imported. Check the forecast record →

Read the matchup brief →Open ESPN source game ↗

Read the evidence correctly.

The top-line adjusted ratings use the full published preseason model. Split statistics below them are unadjusted observations from 2025–26. Opponent ranks are the current model’s ranks, not what was known before each historical game. The “top 50” split is descriptive and does not enter model evaluation.

Rates pool numerators and denominators from games with all fields required for that metric. Missing values remain unavailable; every metric shows its game count. Ranks require at least 10 games and compare programs in the model’s rated field. Ties share rank; percentiles use their average position. High percentiles mean favorable values only for metrics with a defined direction.

Player workloads refer to recorded 2025–26 appearances. Estimated usage divides FGA + 0.475 × FTA + turnovers by minutes-prorated team opportunities in those same games. It assumes team opportunity rates were constant while a player was on court; it is not a lineup or play-by-play measurement. Overtime is included in available minutes. Minutes and usage samples can differ.

Source statistics: SportsDataverse bulk releases, CC BY 4.0. Calculations and model: Silvermine. Definitions draw on publicly documented Four Factors and basketball rate statistics; these are not another publisher’s proprietary ratings. Model notebook →